Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1480534
| From | Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz |
| Date | 2016-09-10 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sfLPM-6hm-233@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sdYel-1Lf-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfGZH-3c2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sfKAh-5va-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10 September 2016 at 09:08, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> wrote: > Reducing the PWM frequency is good by itself since it should not be unnecessarily > fast and helps to make the PWM to "average current" translation more linear. > > The non-linear effect is that the PWM controlled DC/DC converter reacts almost > immediately to a 1->0 control transition but needs some time (ca. 0.5ms) to recover > on a 0->1 transition. DT already allows for compensation of many non-linearities by specifying the duty cycle of each brightness increment. Though, as you observed, there's one limitation it cannot fix here: > If we just fix the PWM generator to output a steady 1 signal at 100%, we have a > very significant change if we switch to 99%, depending on PWM frequency. Specifically the next-to-brightest step (assuming 0.5ms off-time) would be: 75% @ 500 Hz 90% @ 200 Hz 95% @ 100 Hz 96% @ 83 Hz Note that perceptually the distance to 100% might be smaller due to non-linear response of the eye. That's my experience with pwm controlled leds anyway, which may or may not apply to backlights (though with my laptop's backlight I never really have use for the distinct steps at the brightest end while those at the darkest end seem disproportionally large). > This effect becomes smaller if the PWM frequency is reduced and 83Hz seems more > reasonable (although still a little arbitrary) than the current value. While 500Hz is perhaps a bit high, 83Hz actually seems very low to me. Searching a bit around yielded 175 Hz as common frequency for CCFL backlights and higher for LED backlights (source: http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/pulse_width_modulation.htm). (I may be reacting a bit twitchy here due to having encountered dimmed LED lighting that was flickering obnoxiously for me while noone else noticed this.) Matthijs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> - 2016-09-10 09:10 +0200
Re: [Letux-kernel] [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> - 2016-09-10 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com> - 2016-09-10 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> - 2016-09-10 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-09-14 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com> - 2016-09-14 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-09-14 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> - 2016-09-10 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz David Rivshin <drivshin@awxrd.com> - 2016-09-12 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: omap3-gta04: reduce panel backlight PWM frequency to 83Hz Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> - 2016-09-12 17:10 +0200
csiph-web