Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1477889
| From | Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Kexec regression in next-20160906 |
| Date | 2016-09-07 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sey8a-ie-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sewJ3-7Wp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello Tony,
Am Dienstag, 06 September 2016, 15:09:37 schrieb Tony Lindgren:
> Looks like commit 5c01cdd2d4bc ("kexec_file: allow skipping checksum
> calculation for some segments") makes next-20160916 stop working for
> me at least on ARM.
>
> I now get "kexec_load failed: Invalid argument error" on loading the
> new kernel to memory with kexec -l.
>
> Reverting the following two commits makes things work for me again:
>
> d2bf993afdf1 ("kexec_file: add mechanism to update kexec segments")
> 5c01cdd2d4bc ("kexec_file: allow skipping checksum calculation for
> some segments")
Thanks for reporting the problem and finding the commit that caused it.
The only thing in commit 5c01cdd2d4bc which can affect kexec_load is the
fact that struct kexec_segment has a new member.
This is probably breaking the ABI on ARM, then. I verified that kexec_load
kept working on ppc64le with a kexec binary compiled with the original
struct kexec_segment definition, but apparently I got lucky.
I'll prepare a new version of the kexec buffer hand-over series which
doesn't touch struct kexec_segment.
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Kexec regression in next-20160906 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-09-07 00:10 +0200
Re: Kexec regression in next-20160906 Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-07 01:40 +0200
Re: Kexec regression in next-20160906 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-09-07 10:10 +0200
Re: Kexec regression in next-20160906 Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-09-08 17:30 +0200
csiph-web