Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1476928
| From | Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: A potential bug in drivers/iio/light/opt3001.ko |
| Date | 2016-09-05 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <se8nn-8w0-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <scaWm-1dE-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sdm94-7Hd-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <se2UF-4Qu-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 05/09/16 15:15, Pavel Andrianov wrote: > 03.09.2016 19:38, Jonathan Cameron пишет: >> On 31/08/16 11:23, Pavel Andrianov wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> There is a bug in drivers/iio/light/opt3001.ko. Regard such case: >>> >>> Thread 1 Thread 2 >>> -> opt3001_read_raw >>> -> mutex_lock(&opt->lock) >>> -> opt3001_get_lux() >>> .. >>> ->i2c_smbus_write_word_swapped() >>> Now an interrupt comes >>> -> opt3001_irq >>> -> mutex_lock(&opt->lock) >>> >>> This is a deadlock, as the flag ok_to_ignore_lock has not been set yet. >> Good find. Will need reordering to set the ok_to_ignore_lock first. >> Whether it ever actually happens will depend on just how long that EOC >> interrupt takes to happen. Still it's a theoretical problem with >> a fairly simple fix so let's fix it. >>> >>> Regard another case: >>> >>> Thread 1 Thread 2 >>> -> opt3001_read_raw >>> -> mutex_lock(&opt->lock) >>> -> opt3001_get_lux() >>> .. >>> -> i2c_smbus_write_word_swapped() >>> opt->ok_to_ignore_lock = true; >>> Now an interrupt comes >>> -> opt3001_irq >>> .. >>> opt->result_ready = true >>> wake_up() >>> opt->result_ready = false; >>> wait_event_timeout() >>> >>> In this case the first thread misses the result and waits until timeout expires. >>> >> Agreed - looks like some reordering is needed here as well. >> >> Jonathan >> > > In opt3001_get_lux has a comment, that i2c_smbus_write_word_swapped > (line 246) enables interrupt mechanism. If an interrupt can not arise > before the function, the assignments to both of flags should be moved > before i2c_smbus_write_word_swapped and this is the best fix for both > of issues. Do you know if my assumption is correct and interrupts are > disabled before i2c_smbus_write_word_swapped call? Andreas, can you confirm this for us? Thanks, Jonathan
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A potential bug in drivers/iio/light/opt3001.ko Pavel Andrianov <andrianov@ispras.ru> - 2016-08-31 12:30 +0200
Re: A potential bug in drivers/iio/light/opt3001.ko Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-09-03 18:40 +0200
Re: A potential bug in drivers/iio/light/opt3001.ko Pavel Andrianov <andrianov@ispras.ru> - 2016-09-05 16:20 +0200
Re: A potential bug in drivers/iio/light/opt3001.ko Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2016-09-05 22:10 +0200
csiph-web