Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1476912
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 4/7] percpu-rwsem: Add down_read_preempt_disable() |
| Date | 2016-09-05 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <se841-89I-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <se841-89I-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Provide a down_read()/up_read() variant that keeps preemption disabled
over the whole thing, when possible.
This avoids a needless preemption point for constructs such as:
percpu_down_read(&global_rwsem);
spin_lock(&lock);
...
spin_unlock(&lock);
percpu_up_read(&global_rwsem);
Which perturbs timings. In particular it was found to cure a
performance regression in a follow up patch in fs/locks.c
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static struct percpu_rw_semaphore name =
extern int __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *, int);
extern void __percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
-static inline void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
+static inline void percpu_down_read_preempt_disable(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
{
might_sleep();
@@ -46,13 +46,19 @@ static inline void percpu_down_read(stru
__this_cpu_inc(*sem->read_count);
if (unlikely(!rcu_sync_is_idle(&sem->rss)))
__percpu_down_read(sem, false); /* Unconditional memory barrier */
- preempt_enable();
+ barrier();
/*
- * The barrier() from preempt_enable() prevents the compiler from
+ * The barrier() prevents the compiler from
* bleeding the critical section out.
*/
}
+static inline void percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ percpu_down_read_preempt_disable(sem);
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+
static inline int percpu_down_read_trylock(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
{
int ret = 1;
@@ -76,13 +82,13 @@ static inline int percpu_down_read_trylo
return ret;
}
-static inline void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
+static inline void percpu_up_read_preempt_enable(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
{
/*
- * The barrier() in preempt_disable() prevents the compiler from
+ * The barrier() prevents the compiler from
* bleeding the critical section out.
*/
- preempt_disable();
+ barrier();
/*
* Same as in percpu_down_read().
*/
@@ -95,6 +101,12 @@ static inline void percpu_up_read(struct
rwsem_release(&sem->rw_sem.dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
}
+static inline void percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
+{
+ preempt_disable();
+ percpu_up_read_preempt_enable(sem);
+}
+
extern void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
extern void percpu_up_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *);
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 4/7] percpu-rwsem: Add down_read_preempt_disable() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-05 21:50 +0200
csiph-web