Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1474162
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree |
| Date | 2016-09-01 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <scvxL-70R-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <s4HZ8-1pa-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <sc9dU-5u-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sccbM-1TJ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sceZX-3Ew-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <scgfn-4zJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > You acked it, that's saying that you're OK with the patch and are > > > expecting someone else to apply it. > > > No it doesn't, you made that up. :) > > > I know when you and some others Ack a patch, that's what you mean, but > > That's the standard meaning I'm afraid, you're going to confuse people > if you do that. I'd suggest using a different tag if you want to do > this, probably make one up. Reviewed-by-BUT-DONT-TAKE-IT-YOU-FIEND: <me> :) Temporary-Acked-by-[to go through MFD tree]: <me> Suggestions? > > you've been working with me for long enough to know that's not what I > > mean when I Ack a patch. I do it as an indication that I've reviewed > > the patch and I'm happy with it. Most MFD patches that have > > Sorry but I'm not actually reading most of these threads, I've not seen > this behaviour. Mostly I just look at the relevant patches, especially > on the resends where presumably this has been happening. Not sure why I > even saw the ack here, perhaps I had some question about the versioning > API. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-08-31 10:40 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-08-31 13:50 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-08-31 16:50 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-08-31 18:10 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-09-01 10:30 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-09-01 11:00 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-09-01 11:40 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-08-31 20:00 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-09-01 10:20 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-09-01 12:30 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-09-01 13:20 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-09-01 16:30 +0200
Re: Applied "mfd: tps65218: add version check to the PMIC probe" to the regulator tree Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-09-01 17:00 +0200
csiph-web