Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1473972
| From | Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job |
| Date | 2016-09-01 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <scngR-sq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <sckCm-7aI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sclI6-7NG-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <scmb7-8fs-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <scmut-8mg-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <scmXv-kA-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 08/31/2016 04:11 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 15:47 -0700, Rick Jones wrote: >> With regard to drops, are both of you sure you're using the same socket >> buffer sizes? > > Does it really matter ? At least at points in the past I have seen different drop counts at the SO_RCVBUF based on using (sometimes much) larger sizes. The hypothesis I was operating under at the time was that this dealt with those situations where the netserver was held-off from running for "a little while" from time to time. It didn't change things for a sustained overload situation though. >> In the meantime, is anything interesting happening with TCP_RR or >> TCP_STREAM? > > TCP_RR is driven by the network latency, we do not drop packets in the > socket itself. I've been of the opinion it (single stream) is driven by path length. Sometimes by NIC latency. But then I'm almost always measuring in the LAN rather than across the WAN. happy benchmarking, rick
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com> - 2016-08-31 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> - 2016-09-01 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> - 2016-09-01 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-01 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-01 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-09-01 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> - 2016-09-02 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@redhat.com> - 2016-09-01 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] softirq: let ksoftirqd do its job David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2016-09-02 08:40 +0200
csiph-web