Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1473721
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RT PATCH 2/2] net: add a lock around icmp_sk() |
| Date | 2016-08-31 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <schbs-59T-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <scgfn-4zJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <scgfn-4zJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <scgIp-4Kp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:37:43 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 18:00 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with
> > local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I am adding
> > here a local lock. No crash has been observed, this is just precaution.
> >
>
>
> Hmm...
>
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> > net/ipv4/icmp.c | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
> > index c1f1d5030d37..63731fd6af3e 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
> > @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
> > #include <linux/string.h>
> > #include <linux/netfilter_ipv4.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/locallock.h>
> > #include <net/snmp.h>
> > #include <net/ip.h>
> > #include <net/route.h>
> > @@ -205,6 +206,8 @@ static const struct icmp_control icmp_pointers[NR_ICMP_TYPES+1];
> > *
> > * On SMP we have one ICMP socket per-cpu.
> > */
> > +static DEFINE_LOCAL_IRQ_LOCK(icmp_sk_lock);
> > +
> > static struct sock *icmp_sk(struct net *net)
> > {
> > return *this_cpu_ptr(net->ipv4.icmp_sk);
> > @@ -216,12 +219,14 @@ static inline struct sock *icmp_xmit_lock(struct net *net)
> >
> > local_bh_disable();
> >
> > + local_lock(icmp_sk_lock);
>
> Deadlock alert ?
> Please read the comment few lines after, explaining why we have to use
> spin_trylock().
> Or maybe I should double check what is local_lock() in RT
And I don't know exactly what the deadlock scenario of the comment
below is. Is it racing with a softirq somehow?
Note, in RT softirqs can schedule out, and are preemptable. But I don't
know enough about this code to know if that is enough to not have a
deadlock here.
-- Steve
>
> > sk = icmp_sk(net);
> >
> > if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&sk->sk_lock.slock))) {
>
> ...
> > /* This can happen if the output path signals a
> > * dst_link_failure() for an outgoing ICMP packet.
> > */
>
>
> > + local_unlock(icmp_sk_lock);
> > local_bh_enable();
> > return NULL;
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RT PATCH 2/2] net: add a lock around icmp_sk() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-08-31 18:10 +0200
Re: [RT PATCH 2/2] net: add a lock around icmp_sk() Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 18:40 +0200
Re: [RT PATCH 2/2] net: add a lock around icmp_sk() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-08-31 19:10 +0200
Re: [RT PATCH 2/2] net: add a lock around icmp_sk() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-09-01 10:20 +0200
Re: [RT PATCH 2/2] net: add a lock around icmp_sk() Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-09-01 15:20 +0200
csiph-web