Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1473653

Re: [PATCH 0/9] staging: octeon: multi rx group (queue) support

From Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/9] staging: octeon: multi rx group (queue) support
Date 2016-08-31 18:20 +0200
Message-ID <scgp5-4D4-37@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sbWgF-7T-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sc2m6-47N-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sc7lM-7js-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Oops, looks like I tested without CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER enabled
> and that seems to be broken. Sorry.

I'm not using CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER either; the problem is in the
normal cvm_oct_napi_poll() path.

Here's my workaround:

--- a/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet-rx.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static inline int cvm_oct_check_rcv_error(cvmx_wqe_t *work)
 	return 0;
 }

-static int cvm_oct_poll(struct oct_rx_group *rx_group, int budget)
+static int cvm_oct_poll(int group, int budget)
 {
 	const int	coreid = cvmx_get_core_num();
 	u64	old_group_mask;
@@ -181,13 +181,13 @@ static int cvm_oct_poll(struct oct_rx_group *rx_group, int budget)
 	if (OCTEON_IS_MODEL(OCTEON_CN68XX)) {
 		old_group_mask = cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_SSO_PPX_GRP_MSK(coreid));
 		cvmx_write_csr(CVMX_SSO_PPX_GRP_MSK(coreid),
-			       BIT(rx_group->group));
+			       BIT(group));
 		cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_SSO_PPX_GRP_MSK(coreid)); /* Flush */
 	} else {
 		old_group_mask = cvmx_read_csr(CVMX_POW_PP_GRP_MSKX(coreid));
 		cvmx_write_csr(CVMX_POW_PP_GRP_MSKX(coreid),
 			       (old_group_mask & ~0xFFFFull) |
-			       BIT(rx_group->group));
+			       BIT(group));
 	}

 	if (USE_ASYNC_IOBDMA) {
@@ -212,15 +212,15 @@ static int cvm_oct_poll(struct oct_rx_group *rx_group, int budget)
 		if (!work) {
 			if (OCTEON_IS_MODEL(OCTEON_CN68XX)) {
 				cvmx_write_csr(CVMX_SSO_WQ_IQ_DIS,
-					       BIT(rx_group->group));
+					       BIT(group));
 				cvmx_write_csr(CVMX_SSO_WQ_INT,
-					       BIT(rx_group->group));
+					       BIT(group));
 			} else {
 				union cvmx_pow_wq_int wq_int;

 				wq_int.u64 = 0;
-				wq_int.s.iq_dis = BIT(rx_group->group);
-				wq_int.s.wq_int = BIT(rx_group->group);
+				wq_int.s.iq_dis = BIT(group);
+				wq_int.s.wq_int = BIT(group);
 				cvmx_write_csr(CVMX_POW_WQ_INT, wq_int.u64);
 			}
 			break;
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 						     napi);
 	int rx_count;

-	rx_count = cvm_oct_poll(rx_group, budget);
+	rx_count = cvm_oct_poll(rx_group->group, budget);

 	if (rx_count < budget) {
 		/* No more work */
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static int cvm_oct_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
  */
 void cvm_oct_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev)
 {
-	cvm_oct_poll(oct_rx_group, 16);
+	cvm_oct_poll(oct_rx_group->group, 16);
 }
 #endif

> Can you see multiple ethernet IRQs in /proc/interrupts and their
> counters increasing?
> 
> With receive_group_order=4 you should see 16 IRQs.

I see the 16 IRQs, and the first one does increase. But packets don't make
it to the application.

--Ed

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 0/9] staging: octeon: multi rx group (queue) support Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2016-08-30 20:50 +0200
  [PATCH 5/9] staging: octeon: create a struct for rx group specific data Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2016-08-30 20:50 +0200
  [PATCH 2/9] staging: octeon: use passed interrupt number in the handler Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2016-08-30 20:50 +0200
  [PATCH 1/9] staging: octeon: disable rx interrupts in oct_rx_shutdown Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2016-08-30 20:50 +0200
  [PATCH 7/9] staging: octeon: move group number into rx group data Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2016-08-30 21:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/9] staging: octeon: multi rx group (queue) support Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> - 2016-08-31 03:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/9] staging: octeon: multi rx group (queue) support Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2016-08-31 08:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/9] staging: octeon: multi rx group (queue) support Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> - 2016-08-31 18:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/9] staging: octeon: multi rx group (queue) support Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2016-08-31 23:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 0/9] staging: octeon: multi rx group (queue) support Ed Swierk <eswierk@skyportsystems.com> - 2016-09-01 04:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/9] staging: octeon: multi rx group (queue) support Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi> - 2016-08-31 17:10 +0200

csiph-web