Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1471779
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mISDN: mark symbols static where possible |
| Date | 2016-08-29 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sbtRo-7g9-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sbty1-77M-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Monday 29 August 2016, Baoyou Xie wrote: > We get 1 warning when biuld kernel with W=1: > drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c:851:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'initW6692' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared > and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. > so this patch marks it 'static'. > > Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/w6692.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) The patch looks good, but now you have sent two different patches with the same subject line. Since this is just one driver and each instance is a trivial change, I'd suggest doing a single combined patch for them. Similarly, when you have multiple patches within one subsystem (e.g. two different scsi drivers), it helps to have a series of patches as you did with the ASoC patches. Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mISDN: mark symbols static where possible Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org> - 2016-08-29 14:10 +0200 Re: [PATCH] mISDN: mark symbols static where possible Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-29 14:30 +0200
csiph-web