Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1471343
| From | Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 4/4] qspinlock for x86: smp_mb__after_spin_lock() is free |
| Date | 2016-08-28 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sb6UO-1cS-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sb6UO-1cS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sb6UO-1cS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sb6UO-1cS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sb6UO-1cS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
For x86 qspinlocks, no additional memory barrier is required in smp_mb__after_spin_lock: Theoretically, for qspinlock we could define two barriers: - smp_mb__after_spin_lock: Free for x86, not free for powerpc - smp_mb__between_spin_lock_and_spin_unlock_wait(): Free for all archs, see queued_spin_unlock_wait for details. As smp_mb__between_spin_lock_and_spin_unlock_wait() is not used in any hotpaths, the patch does not create that define yet. Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> --- arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h index eaba080..da06433 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/qspinlock.h @@ -61,6 +61,17 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock) } #endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */ +#ifndef smp_mb__after_spin_lock +/** + * smp_mb__after_spin_lock() - Provide smp_mb() after spin_lock + * + * queued_spin_lock() provides full memory barriers semantics, + * thus no further memory barrier is required. See + * queued_spin_unlock_wait() for further details. + */ +#define smp_mb__after_spin_lock() barrier() +#endif + #include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h> #endif /* _ASM_X86_QSPINLOCK_H */ -- 2.5.5
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 4/4] qspinlock for x86: smp_mb__after_spin_lock() is free Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> - 2016-08-28 14:00 +0200 Re: [PATCH 4/4] qspinlock for x86: smp_mb__after_spin_lock() is free Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-08-29 13:00 +0200
csiph-web