Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1470946

[PATCH 1/2] sched: cpufreq: ignore SMT when determining max cpu capacity

From Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH 1/2] sched: cpufreq: ignore SMT when determining max cpu capacity
Date 2016-08-26 20:50 +0200
Message-ID <saumt-2ih-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <saumt-2ih-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


PELT does not consider SMT when scaling its utilization values via
arch_scale_cpu_capacity(). The value in rq->cpu_capacity_orig does
take SMT into consideration though and therefore may be smaller than
the utilization reported by PELT.

On an Intel i7-3630QM for example rq->cpu_capacity_orig is 589 but
util_avg scales up to 1024. This means that a 50% utilized CPU will show
up in schedutil as ~86% busy.

Fix this by using the same CPU scaling value in schedutil as that which
is used by PELT.

Signed-off-by: Steve Muckle <smuckle@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
index 60d985f4dc47..cb8a77b1ef1b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
@@ -147,7 +147,9 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, unsigned long util,
 static void sugov_get_util(unsigned long *util, unsigned long *max)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
-	unsigned long cfs_max = rq->cpu_capacity_orig;
+	unsigned long cfs_max;
+
+	cfs_max = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(NULL, smp_processor_id());
 
 	*util = min(rq->cfs.avg.util_avg, cfs_max);
 	*max = cfs_max;
-- 
2.7.3

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/2] sched: cpufreq: ignore SMT when determining max cpu capacity Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> - 2016-08-26 20:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: cpufreq: ignore SMT when determining max cpu capacity "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-08-31 03:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: cpufreq: ignore SMT when determining max cpu  capacity Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-08-31 16:40 +0200

csiph-web