Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1470325
| From | Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver |
| Date | 2016-08-25 20:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sa7zz-4yA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <s9Jxg-4T1-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <s9Ktk-5vD-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <s9Y3g-6UN-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sa4il-2hA-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sa60O-3vb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 05:38:06PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:56:50AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:07:08AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016, Rich Felker wrote: > > As for this topic, what happened is that, after the first and second > > time of expressing confusion about how the infrastructure did not make > > sense and whether I should even be using it, I did not get anything > > resembling an explanation of why it's the way it is or why I might be > > wrong in thinking it's a bug, and so I went forward with the > > assumption that is was just a bug. Now that Mark Rutland has explained > > it well (and with your additional explanation below in your email), I > > see what the motivation was, but I still think it could be done in a > > less-confusing and more-consistent way that doesn't assume ARM-like > > irq architecture. > > The fun this is that right until the point you sent this patch, it was > consistent for all hardware that we support and were aware of. For others, it > is your hardware that is the confusing case. ;) > > In future, it's better to state 'this doesn't seem to match my hardware' rather > than 'this is misdesigned'. Ideally, with a description of how your hardware > works, as that's the thing no-one else is familiar with. OK. What I meant is "it's not sufficiently general". I usually come at these things not from a particular preconception of how it is/should-be done on some archs I'm familiar with, but minimizing unnecessary (i.e. not beneficial to performance or correctness or simplicity) assumptions at the subsystem level about how hardware could work. > > > If your particular hardware has the old scheme of seperate interrupt numbers > > > for per cpu interrupts, then you can simply use the normal interrupt scheme > > > and request a seperate interrupt per cpu. > > > > Nominally it uses the same range of hardware interrupt numbers for all > > (presently both) cpus, but some of them get delivered to a specific > > cpu associated with the event (presently, IPI and timer; IPI is on a > > fixed number at synthesis time but timer is runtime configurable) > > while others are conceptually deliverable to either cpu (presently > > only delivered to cpu0, but that's treated as an implementation > > detail). > > Given you say it's delivered to the CPU associated with the event (and you have > different PIT bases per-cpu), it sounds like your timer interrupt is percpu, > it's just that the hwirq number can be chosen by software. It's what I would call percpu in the hardware, but I'm not convinced that the Linux irq subsystem's "percpu" stuff models it in a way that fits the hw, nor that it's in any way necessary. > > It currently works requesting the irq with flags that ensure the > > handler runs on the same cpu it was delivered on, without using any > > other percpu irq framework. If you have concerns about ways this could > > break and want me to make the drivers do something else, I'm open to > > suggestions. > > As I suggested, I don't think that this is right, and you need some mechanism > to describe to the kernel that the interrupt is percpu (e.g. a flag in the > interrupt-specifier in DT). Thomas seemed to think it's okay as-is. Can you describe what you expect could go wrong by using request_irq rather than the ARM-style percpu irq framework? Rich
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-08-24 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-08-24 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-08-24 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-08-24 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-25 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-24 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-08-24 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-24 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-08-24 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-25 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-08-25 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-25 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-08-25 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-08-25 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-08-25 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-08-25 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-25 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2016-08-25 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-08-25 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2016-08-25 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: add J-Core timer/clocksource driver Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> - 2016-08-26 11:10 +0200
csiph-web