Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1470293

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2016年08月23日 21:13, Sean Paul wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2016年08月23日 04:30, Sean Paul wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:02 AM, Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2016年08月18日 17:11, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 05:08:14PM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Sean
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for send v3 patch for rk3399 vop support.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But sorry for that, I had changed my mind, those patches are
>>>>>>>>> deprecated,
>>>>>>>>> I have new rk3399 patch on my downstream kernel, I will upstream
>>>>>>>>> soon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wut? Imo merge Sean's patch here, and then rebase your downstream
>>>>>>> patches
>>>>>>> on top of it. That you have a downstream tree which is out of sync
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> upstream shouldn't be a reason to stall upstream development.
>>>>>>> -Daniel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, Sorry for that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In fact, on my downstream kernel, also have those patches, my new
>>>>>> rk3399
>>>>>> patches are based on them,
>>>>>> but the new rk3399 patches will cover the those patches,  Sean's
>>>>>> patches
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> old version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just want to fast forward, don't want to send two version drivers to
>>>>>> upstream.
>>>>>> but if you and Dave feel ok for that, I have no problem:-) .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> merged Sean's patches and then apply new version patches.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, so can I get a review/ack for these revised patches then?
>>>>> Something is better than nothing, and there's a bunch of stuff that
>>>>> depends on these changes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sean
>>>>
>>>> Yes, But I miss your [PATCH v3 0/5] and [PATCH v3 4/5]. do you mean the
>>>> lost
>>>> patches use v2 version?
>>>>
>>> Yes, v2 4/5 was reviewed as-is, so I just applied it.
>>>
>>> Sean
>>
>> Applied this series to my drm-next.
>>
>
> You should probably just rebase your downstream kernel on top of my branch
> here: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~seanpaul/dogwood/log/?h=for-next
>

Resending in plain text.

Sean

> Sean
>
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ｍark Yao
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ｍark Yao
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ｍark Yao
>>
>>
>

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> - 2016-08-17 19:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's  number Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> - 2016-08-18 11:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's  number Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> - 2016-08-18 11:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's  number Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> - 2016-08-18 12:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> - 2016-08-22 22:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's  number Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> - 2016-08-23 02:50 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> - 2016-08-23 15:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's  number Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com> - 2016-08-25 06:40 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] drm/rockchip: sort registers define by chip's number Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> - 2016-08-25 19:30 +0200

csiph-web