Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1558581
| From | Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] drivers/perf: Add support for ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension |
| Date | 2017-01-13 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sZdmN-3eM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sZcAp-2YI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sZcAr-2YI-61@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ARM |
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:03:48 +0000
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> +#define DRVNAME "arm_spe_pmu"
PMU is implied. "arm_spe"?
> +static int arm_spe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> +{
> + u64 reg;
> + struct perf_event_attr *attr = &event->attr;
> + struct arm_spe_pmu *spe_pmu = to_spe_pmu(event->pmu);
> +
> + /* This is, of course, deeply driver-specific */
> + if (attr->type != event->pmu->type)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (event->cpu >= 0 &&
> + !cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &spe_pmu->supported_cpus))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (arm_spe_event_to_pmsevfr(event) & PMSEVFR_EL1_RES0)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (event->hw.sample_period < spe_pmu->min_period ||
> + event->hw.sample_period & PMSIRR_EL1_IVAL_MASK)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if (attr->exclude_idle)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + /*
> + * Feedback-directed frequency throttling doesn't work when we
> + * have a buffer of samples. We'd need to manually count the
> + * samples in the buffer when it fills up and adjust the event
> + * count to reflect that. Instead, force the user to specify a
> + * sample period instead.
> + */
> + if (attr->freq)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode()) {
> + if (attr->exclude_kernel != attr->exclude_hv)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + } else if (!attr->exclude_hv) {
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> + reg = arm_spe_event_to_pmsfcr(event);
> + if ((reg & BIT(PMSFCR_EL1_FE_SHIFT)) &&
> + !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_EVT))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if ((reg & BIT(PMSFCR_EL1_FT_SHIFT)) &&
> + !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_TYP))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + if ((reg & BIT(PMSFCR_EL1_FL_SHIFT)) &&
> + !(spe_pmu->features & SPE_PMU_FEAT_FILT_LAT))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Please insert pr_* statements before blindly returning errors before a
better facility becomes available.
Thanks,
Kim
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH v2 00/10] Add support for the ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-01-13 17:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH v2 09/10] drivers/perf: Add support for ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-01-13 17:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] drivers/perf: Add support for ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com> - 2017-01-13 18:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] drivers/perf: Add support for ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-01-13 18:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] drivers/perf: Add support for ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com> - 2017-01-13 19:20 +0100
csiph-web