Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1554930
| From | Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: x86: prevent setup of invalid routes |
| Date | 2017-01-10 06:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sXXap-5IN-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sP2sF-5nI-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sP2sG-5nI-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:10:05PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The check in kvm_set_pic_irq() and kvm_set_ioapic_irq() was just a
> temporary measure until the code improved enough for us to do this.
>
> This changes APIC in a case when KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING is called to set up pic
> and ioapic routes before KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP. Those rules would get overwritten
> by KVM_CREATE_IRQCHIP at best, so it is pointless to allow it. Userspaces
> hopefully noticed that things don't work if they do that and don't do that.
>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Since we are at here, do we need to protect KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING in
general as well to make sure kernel APIC is there? Like:
---------8<---------
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 482612b..31141a7 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -3057,6 +3057,10 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *entries = NULL;
r = -EFAULT;
+
+ if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
+ goto out;
+
if (copy_from_user(&routing, argp, sizeof(routing)))
goto out;
r = -EINVAL;
--------->8---------
Thanks,
-- peterx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: x86: prevent setup of invalid routes Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> - 2017-01-10 06:30 +0100 Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: x86: prevent setup of invalid routes Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-01-10 10:50 +0100
csiph-web