Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1552472
| From | Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more |
| Date | 2017-01-06 03:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sWs8G-3cr-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sUazf-86o-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sUazf-86o-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sVQd3-2M8-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sW6Uy-5xP-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sWmcW-7os-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io during
>>>> checkpoint.
>>>> Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it will be done when actually reusing
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> Test on initial partition of nvme drive.
>>>>
>>>> # time fstrim /mnt/test
>>>>
>>>> Before : 6.158s
>>>> After : 4.822s
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> One comment below,
>>
>> I still have a comment on this patch.
>>
>>>> -void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>> +/* This should be covered by global mutex, &sit_i->sentry_lock */
>>>> +void f2fs_wait_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int segno)
>>>> {
>>>> struct list_head *wait_list = &(SM_I(sbi)->wait_list);
>>>> struct bio_entry *be, *tmp;
>>>> @@ -646,7 +650,15 @@ void f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>> struct bio *bio = be->bio;
>>>> int err;
>>>>
>>>> - wait_for_completion_io(&be->event);
>>>> + if (!completion_done(&be->event)) {
>>>> + if ((be->start_segno >= segno &&
>>>> + be->end_segno <= segno) ||
>>>
>>> segno >= be->start_segno && segno < be->end_segno ?
Still can not understand this judgment condition, we should wait completion of
discard command only when segno is locate in range of [start_segno, end_segno]?
But now, this condition can be true only when segno, start_segno, end_segno have
equal value.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks,
>>
>> Can you check this?
>
> The be->start_segno and be->end_segno are assigned by:
>
> unsigned int start_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkstart);
> unsigned int end_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkstart + blklen);
>
> in __f2fs_issue_discard_async().
>
> So, the problem comes when, for example, blkstart = 0 and blklen = 512.
>
> I should have got the end_segno by:
>
> unsigned int end_segno = GET_SEGNO(sbi, blkstart + blklen - 1);
>
> Thanks,
>
> .
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2017-01-04 10:40 +0100
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2017-01-05 04:30 +0100
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2017-01-05 10:00 +0100
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-01-05 21:10 +0100
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-01-05 20:50 +0100
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2017-01-06 03:10 +0100
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-01-06 03:50 +0100
Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 08/10] f2fs: relax async discard commands more Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> - 2017-01-06 04:40 +0100
csiph-web