Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1552954
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!news.servidellagleba.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V6 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort |
| Date | Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:00:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sWG23-4DR-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sLSg9-5tS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sLSg9-5tS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sVUgF-5oR-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1483721940; bh=1v0KQRAKjvLkxZiBSVlQ1hmw9mKBAUrmFY5WLpfOTYI=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FTSRvehrWLXZnyzTIByASyvWOq3G9xIC6KokDs/m800V0WTU8Vo8+4HoXtfTPJWV4 bC+daGT9oufuAs1xXeupB4+KfiIHFXyJ++GfpIRznI42ENIbZALYGB2vli7PHcZeZJ 0sZq1LDerhbVcm5YYlAoJe7Nd1UFojrxEpYOFquA= |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1483721938; bh=1v0KQRAKjvLkxZiBSVlQ1hmw9mKBAUrmFY5WLpfOTYI=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=gfk25d+ftkFUnDq96qrb8TQOa2nmfkXPvQxxfJSUly5bPZCnH/Uv3gF/iQvusszAJ IeTg4xcc0691A9Lj923bFc/CU0Wk1rzQzBIlUFqpwljFgoilVu+GRO0Gb7FKrKItrY qOSEgWMe6QQTKR98fBGU8UiUzR6LOsVXLH/bd9so= |
| Dmarc-Filter | OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 55C576115A |
| Authentication-Results | pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org |
| Authentication-Results | pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tbaicar@codeaurora.org |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 103 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, robert.moore@intel.com, lv.zheng@intel.com, nkaje@codeaurora.org, zjzhang@codeaurora.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, eun.taik.lee@samsung.com, sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com, labbott@redhat.com, shijie.huang@arm.com, rruigrok@codeaurora.org, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, tn@semihalf.com, fu.wei@linaro.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, bristot@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com, punit.agrawal@arm.com, astone@redhat.com, harba@codeaurora.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, john.garry@huawei.com, shiju.jose@huawei.com |
| X-Original-Date | Fri, 6 Jan 2017 09:58:54 -0700 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <05841914-183d-f2b6-37d8-4c34ea42b135@codeaurora.org> |
| X-Original-References | <1481147303-7979-1-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <1481147303-7979-5-git-send-email-tbaicar@codeaurora.org> <20170104135413.GE18193@arm.com> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1552954 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hi Will,
On 1/4/2017 6:54 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:48:17PM -0700, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> SEA exceptions are often caused by an uncorrected hardware
>> error, and are handled when data abort and instruction abort
>> exception classes have specific values for their Fault Status
>> Code.
>> When SEA occurs, before killing the process, go through
>> the handlers registered in the notification list.
>> Update fault_info[] with specific SEA faults so that the
>> new SEA handler is used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Naveen Kaje <nkaje@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 13 ++++++++
>> arch/arm64/mm/fault.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> index 57f110b..9040e1d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h
>> @@ -64,4 +64,17 @@ extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd);
>>
>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>
>> +/*
>> + * The functions below are used to register and unregister callbacks
>> + * that are to be invoked when a Synchronous External Abort (SEA)
>> + * occurs. An SEA is raised by certain fault status codes that have
>> + * either data or instruction abort as the exception class, and
>> + * callbacks may be registered to parse or handle such hardware errors.
>> + *
>> + * Registered callbacks are run in an interrupt/atomic context. They
>> + * are not allowed to block or sleep.
>> + */
>> +int register_synchronous_ext_abort_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>> +void unregister_synchronous_ext_abort_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> I think that we may as well use the "SEA" acronym consistently in code,
> expanding it only for strings and comments, so these can be renamed to
> {register,unregister}_sea_notifier. That said, what is the use of having a
> notifier chain here as well as in the ghes code? If the ghes code is the
> only place to register a notifier, we may as well start simple and call that
> code directly, like we call handle_mm_fault directly for data aborts.
I originally used the acronym and got feedback to expand it, but I'll
revert back to just using the acronym.
Using a notifier here is consistent with the SCI error type in the GHES
code which is also only registered in
the GHES code. I can remove the notifier for SEA if you think making the
call directly is better here.
>> static const struct fault_info {
>> int (*fn)(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs);
>> int sig;
>> @@ -502,22 +540,22 @@ static const struct fault_info {
>> { do_page_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "level 1 permission fault" },
>> { do_page_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "level 2 permission fault" },
>> { do_page_fault, SIGSEGV, SEGV_ACCERR, "level 3 permission fault" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous external abort" },
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous external abort" },
> Again, just stick with do_sea for the function name...
>
>> { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 17" },
>> { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 18" },
>> { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 19" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous abort (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous parity error" },
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "level 0 SEA (trans tbl walk)" },
> ... but there's no need to abbreviate "translation table walk" here. Long
> strings that run over 80 chars are fine. Similarly for "SEA".
I will expand this in the next patchset.
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "level 1 SEA (trans tbl walk)" },
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "level 2 SEA (trans tbl walk)" },
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "level 3 SEA (trans tbl walk)" },
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous parity or ECC err" },
>> { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 25" },
>> { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 26" },
>> { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 27" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous parity error (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous parity error (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous parity error (translation table walk)" },
>> - { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "synchronous parity error (translation table walk)" },
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "level 0 synch parity error" },
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "level 1 synch parity error" },
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "level 2 synch parity error" },
>> + { do_synch_ext_abort, SIGBUS, 0, "level 3 synch parity error" },
> Please keep mention of "translation table walk", since we have exception
> levels too and it's confusing just saying "level n".
I will add them back in the next patchset.
Thanks,
Tyler
> Will
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V6 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-01-04 15:00 +0100 Re: [PATCH V6 04/10] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-01-06 18:00 +0100
csiph-web