Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1550444

Re: [RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in pci_mcfg_lookup

From Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in pci_mcfg_lookup
Date 2017-01-04 06:50 +0100
Message-ID <sVMCt-jP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sR7ex-72i-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sVvUZ-5CH-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2017/1/3 20:00, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 05:07:43PM +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
>> Multiple PCIe host bridges may exists in one PCIe segment. So bus range for each
>> host bridge should be in the coverage of bus range of related PCIe segment.
>>
>> This patch will support this kind of scenario:
>>
>> MCFG:
>> 	bus range: 0x00~0xff.
>> 	segment: 0.
>> DSDT:
>> 	host bridge 1:
>> 		bus range: 0x00~0x1f.
>> 		segment: 0.
>> 	host bridge 2:
>> 		bus range: 0x20~0x4f.
>> 		segment: 0.
> 
> "The configuration data provided by an MCFG region (ie PCI segment and
> bus range) may span multiple host bridges.
> 
> Current code in pci_mcfg_lookup() carries out an exact match of host
> bridge bus range start value against the MCFG region(s) bus range start
> value which would cause configurations like the following:
> 
> MCFG region:
> 	bus range: 0x00~0xff.
> 	segment: 0.
> 
> PCI host bridges configuration (segment numbers and bus ranges):
> 	host bridge 1:
> 		bus range: 0x00~0x1f.
> 		segment: 0.
> 	host bridge 2:
> 		bus range: 0x20~0x4f.
> 		segment: 0.
> 
> to fail, in that the bus range start value for host bridge 2 does
> not match the bus range start value of the respective MCFG region.
> 
> Relax the bus range check in pci_mcfg_lookup() to cater for
> PCI configurations with multiple host bridges sharing the same
> MCFG region."
> 
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>

Hi Lorenzo,

Thanks for your view.

I will modify the commit message and post a new version patch.

Regards,
Zhou

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c | 5 ++---
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> index b5b376e..46a3e32 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
>> @@ -40,11 +40,10 @@ phys_addr_t pci_mcfg_lookup(u16 seg, struct resource *bus_res)
>>  	struct mcfg_entry *e;
>>  
>>  	/*
>> -	 * We expect exact match, unless MCFG entry end bus covers more than
>> -	 * specified by caller.
>> +	 * We expect the range in bus_res in the coverage of MCFG bus range.
>>  	 */
>>  	list_for_each_entry(e, &pci_mcfg_list, list) {
>> -		if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start == bus_res->start &&
>> +		if (e->segment == seg && e->bus_start <= bus_res->start &&
>>  		    e->bus_end >= bus_res->end)
>>  			return e->addr;
>>  	}
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1
>>
> 
> .
> 

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in pci_mcfg_lookup Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> - 2016-12-22 09:50 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in  pci_mcfg_lookup Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> - 2017-01-03 02:30 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in  pci_mcfg_lookup Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> - 2017-01-03 07:40 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in  pci_mcfg_lookup Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> - 2017-01-03 10:20 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in  pci_mcfg_lookup Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2017-01-03 13:00 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] ACPI/PCI: Fix bus range comparation in  pci_mcfg_lookup Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com> - 2017-01-04 06:50 +0100

csiph-web