Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1550309

Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing?

Show all headers | View raw

As a tangential party, I am a bit curious: does the randomization
plugin result in a compact structure?  I ask because I know many/most
programmers don't bother with it and so doing so ought to make the
data more compact.

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> how is the code to be verified so that
>> any use of things like offsetof and any
>> address/indexing is not impacted?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-12-17 02:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-12-19 17:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com> - 2016-12-19 17:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-12-19 18:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-12-20 08:20 +0100
        RE: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers "Hammond, John" <john.hammond@intel.com> - 2016-12-20 16:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com> - 2016-12-20 17:50 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-12-20 20:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-12-20 20:20 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2016-12-20 20:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> - 2016-12-20 11:50 +0100
  Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-12-20 18:40 +0100
    Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-01-04 00:50 +0100
      Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 01:00 +0100
        Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-01-04 01:20 +0100
      Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-01-04 07:30 +0100
        Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-01-04 07:40 +0100
          Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> - 2017-01-04 18:00 +0100
            Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> - 2017-01-04 18:40 +0100
            Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-01-04 23:40 +0100

csiph-web