Re: [PATCH] x86: fix kaslr and memmap collision

From	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH] x86: fix kaslr and memmap collision
Date	2017-01-03 19:30 +0100
Message-ID	<sVC0p-1Og-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sG78d-8kM-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGeW5-4Pc-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGnd0-1Py-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sVsNr-3qW-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 11/22/16 at 09:26am, Dan Williams wrote:
>> [ replying for Dave since he's offline today and tomorrow ]
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > * Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE relocates the kernel to a random base address.
>> >> However it does not take into account the memmap= parameter passed in from
>> >> the kernel commandline.
>> >
>> > memmap= parameters are often used as a list.
>> >
>> >> [...] This results in the kernel sometimes being put in the middle of the user
>> >> memmap. [...]
>> >
>> > What does this mean? If memmap= is used to re-define the memory map then the
>> > kernel getting in the middle of a RAM area is what we want, isn't it? What we
>> > don't want is for the kernel to get into reserved areas, right?
>>
>> Right, this is about teaching kaslr to not land the kernel in newly
>> defined reserved regions that were not marked reserved in the initial
>> e820 map from platform firmware.
>
> If only tell kaslr to not land kernel in newly defined reserved regions,
> memory added by "memmap=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]" should not be avoided since
> it's usable memory. Kernel randomized into this region is also what we
> want. Not sure if I understand it right.

You're right, this is supposed to be for memmap=nn!ss cases which
defines reserved persistent memory ranges, not memmap=nn@ss which
defines usable memory.

We need to fix mem_avoid_memmap() to only skip memmap= statements that
specify reserved memory.

Thread

Re: [PATCH] x86: fix kaslr and memmap collision Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> - 2017-01-03 09:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] x86: fix kaslr and memmap collision Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-01-03 17:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] x86: fix kaslr and memmap collision Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-01-03 19:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] x86: fix kaslr and memmap collision Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> - 2017-01-03 21:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] x86: fix kaslr and memmap collision Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> - 2017-01-04 03:00 +0100

csiph-web