Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Remove set_task_state()

From	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Remove set_task_state()
Date	2017-01-03 19:20 +0100
Message-ID	<sVBQK-1Kc-47@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<sU9Wx-7Sb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sVucx-4Jk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sVBH3-1F1-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:06:58AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Jan 2017, Mark Rutland wrote:
> 
> >Does the below help?
> 
> It does, yes. Performance is pretty much the same with either function
> without sysreg.

Great!

> With arm no longer in the picture, I'll send up another patchset with
> this change as well as Peter's cleanup remarks.

I intend to send a cleaned up version of the arm64 patch to Catalin in a
moment; the read_sysreg() issue is a regression introduced in v4.10-rc1,
so we should be able to get it in as a fix.

Thanks,
Mark.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC PATCH] sched: Remove set_task_state() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-12-30 19:20 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Remove set_task_state() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-01-03 10:30 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Remove set_task_state() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-01-03 11:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Remove set_task_state() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-01-03 19:10 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Remove set_task_state() Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> - 2017-01-03 19:20 +0100

csiph-web