Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1549128

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM.

From Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM.
Date 2017-01-02 12:40 +0100
Message-ID <sV986-6ct-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sOeFz-5aj-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sV7fY-4MF-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:36:10AM +0000, Rafal Ozieblo wrote:
> According Cadence Hardware team:
> "It is just that some customers prefer to have the time in the descriptors as that is provided per frame.
> The registers are simply overwritten when a new event frame is transmitted/received and so software could miss it."
> The question is are you sure that you read timestamp for current frame? (not for the next frame).

AFAICT, having the time stamp in the descriptor is not universally
supported.  Looking at the Xilinx Zynq 7000 TRM, I can't find any
mention of this.

This Cadence IP core is a complete disaster.

Unless someone can tell us how this IP works in all of its
incarnations, this series is going nowhere.

Thanks,
Richard

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Andrei Pistirica <andrei.pistirica@microchip.com> - 2016-12-14 11:10 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2016-12-28 09:20 +0100
  RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@cadence.com> - 2016-12-28 16:00 +0100
  RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@cadence.com> - 2017-01-02 10:40 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 12:40 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Harini Katakam <harinikatakamlinux@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 12:50 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 17:10 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2017-01-02 15:50 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2017-01-02 17:20 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Harini Katakam <harinikatakamlinux@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 06:10 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 11:30 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 11:40 +0100
              Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Harini Katakam <harinikatakamlinux@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 12:00 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2017-01-03 12:20 +0100
            RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@cadence.com> - 2017-01-03 11:50 +0100
              Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v4 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence  GEM. Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2017-01-03 15:30 +0100

csiph-web