Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1546655
| From | Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature |
| Date | 2016-12-23 01:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sRlAS-7Xi-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sOOg1-4cX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sR25c-3JP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sRiMG-69S-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 12/22/2016 5:02 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Wed 21 Dec 19:16 PST 2016, Suman Anna wrote: > >> Hi Sarang, >> >> On 12/15/2016 06:03 PM, Sarangdhar Joshi wrote: >>> The function wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread waits for asynchronous >>> firmware loading to complete successfully before calling >>> rproc_boot(). The same can be achieved by just setting >>> rproc->auto_boot flag. Change this. As a result this change >>> removes wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread and moves m3_ipc->sync_complete >>> initialization to the wkup_m3_ipc_probe(). >>> >>> Other than the current usage, the firmware_loading_complete is >>> only used in rproc_del() where it's no longer needed. This >>> change is in preparation for removing firmware_loading_complete >>> completely. >> >> Based on the comments so far, I am assuming that you are dropping this >> series. >> > > Following up on those comments only revealed that we have several other > similar race conditions, so I'm hoping that Sarangdhar will continue to > work on fixing those - and in this process get rid of this completion. > >> In any case, this series did break our PM stack. We definitely don't >> want to auto-boot the wkup_m3_rproc device, that responsibility will >> need to stay with the wkup_m3_ipc driver. >> > > Reviewing the wkup_m3 situation again I see that as we have moved the > resource table parsing to the rproc_boot() path there's no longer any > need for the wkup_m3_ipc driver to wait for the remoteproc-core-internal > completion. > > If rproc_get_by_phandle() returns non-NULL it is initialized. We still > don't want to call rproc_boot() from wkup_m3_ipc_probe(), so let's keep > the wkup_m3_rproc_boot_thread(). Did you mean it's okay to call rproc_boot() from wkup_m3_ipc_probe()? rproc_boot() calls request_firmware() anyways and so there is no need to wait for completion of asynchronous firmware loading. > > Sarangdhar, could you update the wkup_m3_ipc patch to just drop the > wait_for_completion() call? Sure, assuming we should still keep the rproc_boot() call in the kthread. Regards, Sarang > > Regards, > Bjorn > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-remoteproc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2016-12-16 01:10 +0100
[PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Remove firmware_loading_complete Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2016-12-16 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Remove firmware_loading_complete loic pallardy <loic.pallardy@st.com> - 2016-12-16 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Remove firmware_loading_complete Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2016-12-16 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Remove firmware_loading_complete Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2016-12-17 03:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2016-12-22 04:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2016-12-22 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2016-12-23 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2016-12-23 18:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Sarangdhar Joshi <spjoshi@codeaurora.org> - 2016-12-23 01:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2016-12-23 18:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: ti: Use remoteproc auto_boot feature Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> - 2016-12-24 01:00 +0100
csiph-web