Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1546142
| From | Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to claim |
| Date | 2016-12-22 04:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sR2eS-3O8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sQLe1-1u1-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sR0mJ-2AR-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:19:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [CC Mika and linux-acpi]
>
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 05:24:55 PM Chen Yu wrote:
> > Sometimes we have the following error message:
> > platform MSFT0101:00: failed to claim resource 1
> > acpi MSFT0101:00: platform device creation failed: -16
> > But there is not enough information to figure out which resource range
> > failed to claim.
> >
> > Thus print the resource range at first-place thus /proc/iomem or
> > ioports should tell us who already claimed this resource, then
> > the driver bug or incorrect resource assignment which is running
> > into this conflict can be diagnosed:
> > platform MSFT0101:00: failed to claim resource 1: [mem 0xfed40000-0xfed40fff]
> > acpi MSFT0101:00: platform device creation failed: -16
> >
> > Suggested-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Reported-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/platform.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > index c4af003..22a6430 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ int platform_device_add(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > }
> >
> > if (p && insert_resource(p, r)) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to claim resource %d\n", i);
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to claim resource %d: %pR\n", i, r);
>
> Do we still need the resource number?
>
Seems we don't need the resource number anymore.
(As platform.c was written earlier than 2005, and the support of %pR was introduced
later in 2008.)
> > ret = -EBUSY;
> > goto failed;
> > }
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
Thanks,
Yu
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to claim Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-12-21 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to claim "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-12-22 02:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to claim Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-12-22 04:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to claim Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@intel.com> - 2016-12-22 10:20 +0100
csiph-web