Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1546142

Re: [PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to claim

From Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to claim
Date 2016-12-22 04:30 +0100
Message-ID <sR2eS-3O8-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sQLe1-1u1-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sR0mJ-2AR-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 02:19:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [CC Mika and linux-acpi]
> 
> On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 05:24:55 PM Chen Yu wrote:
> > Sometimes we have the following error message:
> >  platform MSFT0101:00: failed to claim resource 1
> >  acpi MSFT0101:00: platform device creation failed: -16
> > But there is not enough information to figure out which resource range
> > failed to claim.
> > 
> > Thus print the resource range at first-place thus /proc/iomem or
> > ioports should tell us who already claimed this resource, then
> > the driver bug or incorrect resource assignment which is running
> > into this conflict can be diagnosed:
> >  platform MSFT0101:00: failed to claim resource 1: [mem 0xfed40000-0xfed40fff]
> >  acpi MSFT0101:00: platform device creation failed: -16
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > Reported-by: Wendy Wang <wendy.wang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/base/platform.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > index c4af003..22a6430 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/platform.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
> > @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ int platform_device_add(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  		}
> >  
> >  		if (p && insert_resource(p, r)) {
> > -			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to claim resource %d\n", i);
> > +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to claim resource %d: %pR\n", i, r);
> 
> Do we still need the resource number?
> 
Seems we don't need the resource number anymore.
(As platform.c was written earlier than 2005, and the support of %pR was introduced
later in 2008.)
> >  			ret = -EBUSY;
> >  			goto failed;
> >  		}
> > 
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 

Thanks,
Yu

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to claim Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-12-21 10:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to claim "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-12-22 02:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to  claim Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> - 2016-12-22 04:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] platform: Print the resource range if device failed to  claim Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@intel.com> - 2016-12-22 10:20 +0100

csiph-web