Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1545239
| From | Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: kernel/bpf/verifier.c: 4 * possible unintended fallthrough ? |
| Date | 2016-12-20 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sQviW-7Qa-45@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sQviW-7Qa-47@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:20 AM, David Binderman <dcb314@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hello there, > > I just tried to compile kernel-4.9 with a recent development > version of gcc. It said > > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1907:23: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1918:23: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1859:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > kernel/bpf/verifier.c:1869:24: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > > Source code for the first one is > > case BPF_JGT: > /* Unsigned comparison, the minimum value is 0. */ > true_reg->min_value = 0; > case BPF_JSGT: > > Suggest either add the missing break or document the fallthrough > with a comment something like /* FALLTHROUGH */ I've tried 4.9 and 5.2 and don't see this warning. Is this 6.x gcc? I suspect it will have such warnings all over the kernel.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: kernel/bpf/verifier.c: 4 * possible unintended fallthrough ? Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2016-12-20 17:20 +0100
csiph-web