Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1543867

Re: thermal zones break with patch "Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree" (mainline+next)

From Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: thermal zones break with patch "Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree" (mainline+next)
Date 2016-12-17 01:50 +0100
Message-ID <sPbmi-2kE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sP853-t2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sP8oq-zl-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Matthew,

Am Freitag, 16. Dezember 2016, 21:19:37 CET schrieb Matthew Wilcox:
> From: Heiko Stuebner [mailto:heiko@sntech.de]
> 
> > commit b05bbe3ea2db ("Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree")
> > seems to
> > break thermal zone allocation. This happens both on todays mainline and
> > linux-next-20161216 and produces errors like:
> 
> 
> 
> > While I haven't looked to deeply into what idr exactly does, some
> > findings:
 - thermal_zone0 and thermal_zone1 are allocated correctly
> > - every further thermal_zone always gets allocated the number "1"
> > - thermal core calls idr_alloc with 0 for both start and end
> > - the rewrite-patch seems to change the semantics of idr_alloc
> > 
> >   where it orignally said "@end: the maximum id (exclusive, <= 0 for
> >   max)"
> >   the "<= 0" part is gone now, but I checked, simply setting INT_MAX
> >   as end in the thermal_core does not help
> 
> 
> Hi Heiko,
> 
> Thanks for the report!  The problem is because the thermal subsystem calls
> idr_alloc() passing a NULL pointer for the data.  I have fixed this problem
> in my git tree but haven't sent the patch to Andrew yet.  This patch should
> fix the problem for you:
 
> http://git.infradead.org/users/willy/linux-dax.git/commitdiff/c52eeed7b759c3
> fefe9b7f1b0a17a438df6950f3

yay, this fixes the issue. This should definitly go as fix into 4.10-rc and when 
you send it to Andrew you can add my

Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

 
> Now ... thermal is actually using an IDR when it could save memory by using
> an IDA.  Are you interested in doing that conversion?

That would more be a question for Eduardo and Rui :-) . I'm just in the 
process of tracking down the smallish issues on my Rockchip board that are 
poping up during the merge-window.


Anyway, thanks for pointing to the fix
Heiko

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

thermal zones break with patch "Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree" (mainline+next) Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-12-16 22:20 +0100
  RE: thermal zones break with patch "Reimplement IDR and IDA using the  radix tree" (mainline+next) Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> - 2016-12-16 22:40 +0100
    Re: thermal zones break with patch "Reimplement IDR and IDA using the radix tree" (mainline+next) Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-12-17 01:50 +0100
      Re: thermal zones break with patch "Reimplement IDR and IDA using  the radix tree" (mainline+next) Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> - 2016-12-20 05:00 +0100
    Re: thermal zones break with patch "Reimplement IDR and IDA using the  radix tree" (mainline+next) Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2016-12-18 20:50 +0100
      RE: thermal zones break with patch "Reimplement IDR and IDA using the  radix tree" (mainline+next) Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> - 2016-12-19 17:40 +0100

csiph-web