Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1543722

Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?

From Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?
Date 2016-12-16 21:00 +0100
Message-ID <sP6PE-7WR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sOYp3-2rU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sP3f3-5TP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Friday, December 16, 2016 4:54:33 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > Specifically on ARM, going further makes things rather useless especially
> > for build testing: with gcc-4.2, we lose support for ARMv7, EABI, and
> > effectively ARMv6 (as it relies on EABI for building reliably). Also,
> > the number of false-positive build warnings is so high that it is useless
> > for finding actual bugs from the warnings.
> 
> If you start with that activity now, there's indeed a massive amount of
> warnings to look into.
> However, I've been build testing various configs with m68k-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1.2
> and looking at the compiler warnings for years, so I only have to look
> at new warnings.

What's the reason for sticking with gcc-4.1? Does this actually work better
for you than a more recent version, or is it just whatever you installed
when you started the build testing?

	Arnd

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 12:10 +0100
  [PATCH 01/13] [HACK] gcc-4.5: avoid  link errors for unused function pointers Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 12:10 +0100
  Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 12:20 +0100
  Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-12-16 17:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 21:00 +0100
      Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-12-16 21:40 +0100
  Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2016-12-16 18:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 23:10 +0100
      Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2016-12-17 12:40 +0100
        Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-01-02 13:30 +0100
      Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-12-20 11:00 +0100

csiph-web