Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1543722
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? |
| Date | 2016-12-16 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sP6PE-7WR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sOYp3-2rU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sP3f3-5TP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Friday, December 16, 2016 4:54:33 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > Specifically on ARM, going further makes things rather useless especially > > for build testing: with gcc-4.2, we lose support for ARMv7, EABI, and > > effectively ARMv6 (as it relies on EABI for building reliably). Also, > > the number of false-positive build warnings is so high that it is useless > > for finding actual bugs from the warnings. > > If you start with that activity now, there's indeed a massive amount of > warnings to look into. > However, I've been build testing various configs with m68k-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1.2 > and looking at the compiler warnings for years, so I only have to look > at new warnings. What's the reason for sticking with gcc-4.1? Does this actually work better for you than a more recent version, or is it just whatever you installed when you started the build testing? Arnd
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 12:10 +0100
[PATCH 01/13] [HACK] gcc-4.5: avoid link errors for unused function pointers Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 12:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 12:20 +0100
Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-12-16 17:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 21:00 +0100
Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-12-16 21:40 +0100
Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2016-12-16 18:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-12-16 23:10 +0100
Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc> - 2016-12-17 12:40 +0100
Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2017-01-02 13:30 +0100
Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-12-20 11:00 +0100
csiph-web