Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1540299

RE: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area.

From Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area.
Date 2016-12-12 13:10 +0100
Message-ID <sNxAD-49G-65@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sLjBL-8aU-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sNxAD-49G-67@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi,

>A PC24 relocation has a range of +/-32MB.  This means that where-ever
>the module is placed, it must be capable of reaching any function
>within the kernel text, which may itself be quite large (eg, 8MB, or
>possibly larger).  The module area exists to allow modules to be
>located in an area where PC24 relocations are able to reach all of the
>kernel text on sensibly configured kernels, thereby allowing for
>optimal performance.
>
>If you wish to load large modules, then enable ARM_MODULE_PLTS, which
>will use the less efficient PLT method (which is basically an indirect
>function call) for relocations that PC24 can't handle, and will allow
>the module to be loaded into the vmalloc area.
>
>Growing the module area so that smaller modules also get penalised by
>the PLT indirection is not sane.

This is exactly what i am saying. These changes are useful to accomdate
22MB modules without enabling ARM_MODULE_PLTS. 
Without these changes ARM_MODULE_PLTS needs to be enabled to insert more than 14MB
modules but with these changes 22MB modules (considering 8MB uImage) can be inserted 
without enabling ARM_MODULE_PLTS.

So till 22MB modules are not penalised but without these changes once size of modules
gets over 14MB PLT becomes must. 

Regards,
Vaneet Narang

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com> - 2016-12-06 09:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-12-06 10:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-12-06 17:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com> - 2016-12-12 11:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-12-12 11:30 +0100
  RE: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com> - 2016-12-12 13:10 +0100
    Re: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-12-12 14:00 +0100
    RE: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module  area. Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-12-12 16:30 +0100
      Re: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-12-12 18:00 +0100

csiph-web