Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1540299
| From | Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. |
| Date | 2016-12-12 13:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sNxAD-49G-65@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sLjBL-8aU-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sNxAD-49G-67@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi, >A PC24 relocation has a range of +/-32MB. This means that where-ever >the module is placed, it must be capable of reaching any function >within the kernel text, which may itself be quite large (eg, 8MB, or >possibly larger). The module area exists to allow modules to be >located in an area where PC24 relocations are able to reach all of the >kernel text on sensibly configured kernels, thereby allowing for >optimal performance. > >If you wish to load large modules, then enable ARM_MODULE_PLTS, which >will use the less efficient PLT method (which is basically an indirect >function call) for relocations that PC24 can't handle, and will allow >the module to be loaded into the vmalloc area. > >Growing the module area so that smaller modules also get penalised by >the PLT indirection is not sane. This is exactly what i am saying. These changes are useful to accomdate 22MB modules without enabling ARM_MODULE_PLTS. Without these changes ARM_MODULE_PLTS needs to be enabled to insert more than 14MB modules but with these changes 22MB modules (considering 8MB uImage) can be inserted without enabling ARM_MODULE_PLTS. So till 22MB modules are not penalised but without these changes once size of modules gets over 14MB PLT becomes must. Regards, Vaneet Narang
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com> - 2016-12-06 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-12-06 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-12-06 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com> - 2016-12-12 11:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-12-12 11:30 +0100
RE: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Vaneet Narang <v.narang@samsung.com> - 2016-12-12 13:10 +0100
Re: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk> - 2016-12-12 14:00 +0100
RE: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2016-12-12 16:30 +0100
Re: Re: [PATCH 1/1] arm/module: maximum utilization of module area. Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2016-12-12 18:00 +0100
csiph-web