Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1540504

Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected by obdo move

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 17:34 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> 
> A: No.
> Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
> 
> http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> 
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:42:29PM +0000, Ben Evans wrote:
> > This was done to conform to the Lustre Coding Guidelines.
> 
> What is this mythical guidelines, and why does it differ from the kernel
> source ones?

It's not like it's hard to find
http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Coding_Style_Guidelines

And in specific:
http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Style_Guide_Includes

There is no single mandated code style for this.
Some people like reverse christmas tree.

Whatever...

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected by  obdo move Ben Evans <bevans@cray.com> - 2016-12-12 16:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected  by obdo move Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-12-12 17:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected  by obdo move Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-12-12 19:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected  by obdo move James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2016-12-12 20:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected  by obdo move Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2016-12-12 21:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected by  obdo move Ben Evans <bevans@cray.com> - 2016-12-12 19:30 +0100

csiph-web