Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1539203
| From | Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. |
| Date | 2016-12-09 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sMpc6-16k-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sLMkq-1Oz-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sLQem-4fD-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sLRN7-5kc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sM8bf-7j1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sMm4x-7Lb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:07:23AM +0530, Harini Katakam wrote: > I'm afraid I don't get why we are choosing the most limited max adj.. > Sorry if I'm missing something - could you please help me understand? This max_adj is only important when the local clock offset is large and user space chooses not to step the time value. In that case, user space will want to run the clock as fast (or as slow) as possible in order to catch up with the remote clock. The driver must provide a max_adj that is always safe for user space to apply via the clock_adjtime() system call. HTH, Richard
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Andrei Pistirica <andrei.pistirica@microchip.com> - 2016-12-07 16:30 +0100
[RFC PATCH net-next v3 2/2] macb: Enable 1588 support in SAMA5Dx platforms. Andrei Pistirica <andrei.pistirica@microchip.com> - 2016-12-07 16:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 2/2] macb: Enable 1588 support in SAMA5Dx platforms. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 20:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 20:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2016-12-07 22:20 +0100
RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. <Andrei.Pistirica@microchip.com> - 2016-12-08 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Harini Katakam <harinikatakamlinux@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 06:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com> - 2016-12-09 10:00 +0100
RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@cadence.com> - 2016-12-09 10:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/2] macb: Add 1588 support in Cadence GEM. Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> - 2016-12-08 11:10 +0100
csiph-web