Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1539057
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math |
| Date | 2016-12-09 05:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sMkFr-6X5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sMdXk-2rQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sMdXl-2rQ-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> If the timekeeping CPU is scheduled out long enough by a hypervisor the
> clocksource delta multiplication can overflow and as a result time can go
> backwards. That's insane to begin with, but people already triggered a
> signed multiplication overflow, so a unsigned overflow is not necessarily
> impossible.
>
> Implement optional 128bit math which can be selected by a config option.
What's the rough VM interruption time that would trigger an overflow? Given that
the clock shift tk_read_base::mult is often 1, isn't it 32-bit nsecs, i.e. 4
seconds?
That doesn't sound 'insanely long'.
Or some other value?
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_INT128) && defined(__SIZEOF_INT128__)
> +static inline u64 timekeeping_delta_to_ns(struct tk_read_base *tkr, u64 delta)
> +{
> + unsigned __int128 nsec;
> +
> + nsec = ((unsigned __int128)delta * tkr->mult) + tkr->xtime_nsec;
> + return (u64) (nsec >> tkr->shift);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline u64 timekeeping_delta_to_ns(struct tk_read_base *tkr, u64 delta)
> +{
> + u32 dh, dl;
> + u64 nsec;
> +
> + dl = delta;
> + dh = delta >> 32;
> +
> + nsec = ((u64)dl * tkr->mult) + tkr->xtime_nsec;
> + nsec >>= tkr->shift;
> + if (unlikely(dh))
> + nsec += ((u64)dh * tkr->mult) << (32 - tkr->shift);
> + return nsec;
> +}
> +#endif
Actually, 128-bit multiplication shouldn't be too horrible - at least on 64-bit
architectures. (128-bit division is another matter, but there's no division here.)
So we might as well use this by default on 64-bit architectures that have 64-bit
cycle counters - which the vast majority of hypervisors are. Assuming I'm correct
that just 4 seconds of VM delay would make the whole logic unrobust.
Thanks,
Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[patch 0/6] timekeeping: Cure the signed/unsigned wreckage Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-12-08 22:00 +0100
[patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-12-08 22:00 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-12-09 05:10 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-12-09 05:30 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-12-09 05:50 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 05:50 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-12-09 06:30 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 06:50 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 06:20 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 07:10 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 06:30 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 07:40 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 09:40 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 10:20 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 11:10 +0100
Re: [patch 5/6] [RFD] timekeeping: Provide optional 128bit math Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 11:20 +0100
[patch 3/6] timekeeping: Get rid of pointless typecasts Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-12-08 22:00 +0100
Re: [patch 3/6] timekeeping: Get rid of pointless typecasts David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> - 2016-12-09 00:50 +0100
[tip:timers/core] timekeeping: Get rid of pointless typecasts tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-12-09 12:20 +0100
Re: [patch 0/6] timekeeping: Cure the signed/unsigned wreckage John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2016-12-09 06:00 +0100
Re: [patch 0/6] timekeeping: Cure the signed/unsigned wreckage Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-12-09 06:40 +0100
csiph-web