Re: btrfs_destroy_inode warn (outstanding extents)

From	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: btrfs_destroy_inode warn (outstanding extents)
Date	2016-12-09 22:20 +0100
Message-ID	<sMAKd-8id-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <syqB3-6Fs-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sAyXv-7VA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGLyF-Aw-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGLS1-Hd-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJBCO-5Lz-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:32:09AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> (function-graph screws up the RIP for some reason, 'return_to_handler'
>  should actually be btrfs_destroy_inode)

That's because function_graph hijacks the return address and replaces it with
return_to_handler. The back trace has code to show what that handler is
suppose to be. But I should see why the WARNING shows it instead, and fix
that too.

Thanks,

-- Steve

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: btrfs_destroy_inode warn (outstanding extents) Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> - 2016-12-01 16:40 +0100
  Re: btrfs_destroy_inode warn (outstanding extents) Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> - 2016-12-03 18:00 +0100
    Re: btrfs_destroy_inode warn (outstanding extents) Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> - 2016-12-07 18:00 +0100
  Re: btrfs_destroy_inode warn (outstanding extents) Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-12-09 22:20 +0100

csiph-web