Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1538545

Re: Lockdep splat from destroy_workqueue() with RT_PREEMPT_FULL

Show all headers | View raw

On 2016-12-08 12:20:28 [+0000], John Keeping wrote:
> Hi,
Hi John,

> I am seeing the following splat when stopping btattach on v4.4.30-rt41
> with PREEMPT_RT_FULL with lockdep and slub_debug.
> 
> The bad unlock balance seems to just be an effect of the lock having
> been overwritten with POISON_FREE, the real issue is that
> put_pwq_unlocked() is not resuming and unlocking the pool before the RCU
> work scheduled indirectly by put_pwq() has completed.

can you reproduce this? If so, is this patch helping?

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1135,9 +1135,11 @@ static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 		 * As both pwqs and pools are RCU protected, the
 		 * following lock operations are safe.
 		 */
+		rcu_read_lock();
 		local_spin_lock_irq(pendingb_lock, &pwq->pool->lock);
 		put_pwq(pwq);
 		local_spin_unlock_irq(pendingb_lock, &pwq->pool->lock);
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 }
 

Sebastian

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Lockdep splat from destroy_workqueue() with RT_PREEMPT_FULL John Keeping <john@metanate.com> - 2016-12-08 13:50 +0100
  Re: Lockdep splat from destroy_workqueue() with RT_PREEMPT_FULL Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2016-12-08 14:40 +0100
    Re: Lockdep splat from destroy_workqueue() with RT_PREEMPT_FULL John Keeping <john@metanate.com> - 2016-12-08 17:30 +0100

csiph-web