Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1537171
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/fpu: Fix CPUID-less FPU detection |
| Date | 2016-12-06 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sLsc1-59b-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sLcqB-3CS-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sLcqB-3CS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sLkxQ-hE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 05:01:14PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> The old code didn't work at all because it adjusted the current caps
>> instead of the forced caps. Anything it did would be undone later
>> during cpu identification. Fix that and, while we're at it, improve
>> the logging and don't bother running it if CPUID is available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
>> index 60dece392b3a..75e1bf3b0319 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/init.c
>> @@ -50,29 +50,33 @@ void fpu__init_cpu(void)
>>
>> /*
>> * The earliest FPU detection code.
>> - *
>> - * Set the X86_FEATURE_FPU CPU-capability bit based on
>> - * trying to execute an actual sequence of FPU instructions:
>> */
>> static void fpu__init_system_early_generic(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
>> {
>> - unsigned long cr0;
>> - u16 fsw, fcw;
>> + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CPUID) &&
>> + !test_bit(X86_FEATURE_FPU, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared)) {
>
> Flip test and save an indentation level.
How? There's that bit at the bottom to worry about.
>
>> + /*
>> + * Set the X86_FEATURE_FPU CPU-capability bit based on
>> + * trying to execute an actual sequence of FPU instructions:
>> + */
>>
>> - fsw = fcw = 0xffff;
>> + unsigned long cr0;
>> + u16 fsw, fcw;
>>
>> - cr0 = read_cr0();
>> - cr0 &= ~(X86_CR0_TS | X86_CR0_EM);
>> - write_cr0(cr0);
>> + fsw = fcw = 0xffff;
>> +
>> + cr0 = read_cr0();
>> + cr0 &= ~(X86_CR0_TS | X86_CR0_EM);
>> + write_cr0(cr0);
>>
>> - if (!test_bit(X86_FEATURE_FPU, (unsigned long *)cpu_caps_cleared)) {
>> asm volatile("fninit ; fnstsw %0 ; fnstcw %1"
>> : "+m" (fsw), "+m" (fcw));
>> + pr_info("x86/fpu: FSW=0x%04hx FCW=0x%04hx\n", fsw, fcw);
>
> Why do we want those in dmesg? Maybe KERN_DEBUG?
For debugging, since this code appears busted in every version of
Linux I looked at. It's certainly been busted for quite a few years.
And this line won't print on any CPU with CPUID, so it's not going to
cause widespread spam. I kind of line the idea of being able to ask
users of these ancient CPUs to just send in their logs.
--Andy
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/6] CPUID and FPU fixes Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-12-06 02:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/fpu: Fix "x86/fpu: Legacy x87 FPU detected" message Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-12-06 02:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/fpu: Fix "x86/fpu: Legacy x87 FPU detected" message Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-12-06 10:30 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/fpu: Fix "x86/fpu: Legacy x87 FPU detected" message Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-12-06 19:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/fpu: Fix "x86/fpu: Legacy x87 FPU detected" message Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-12-06 19:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/fpu: Fix CPUID-less FPU detection Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-12-06 02:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/fpu: Fix CPUID-less FPU detection Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-12-06 10:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/fpu: Fix CPUID-less FPU detection Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-12-06 19:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 5/6] x86/fpu: Fix CPUID-less FPU detection Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-12-07 10:50 +0100
[RFC PATCH 6/6] x86/fpu: Fix the "Giving up, no FPU found" test Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-12-06 02:10 +0100
[RFC PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: Re-apply forced caps every time cpu caps are re-read Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-12-06 02:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] x86/cpu: Re-apply forced caps every time cpu caps are re-read Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-12-06 10:00 +0100
[RFC PATCH 2/6] x86/cpu: Factor out application of forced cpu caps Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-12-06 02:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] x86/cpu: Factor out application of forced cpu caps Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-12-06 09:40 +0100
csiph-web