Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1536583

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc: get hugetlbpage handling more generic

From Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc: get hugetlbpage handling more generic
Date 2016-12-06 02:20 +0100
Message-ID <sLcAh-3FT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sjKV4-6zb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sjKV4-6zb-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization NXP

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 10:11 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Today there are two implementations of hugetlbpages which are managed
> by exclusive #ifdefs:
> * FSL_BOOKE: several directory entries points to the same single hugepage
> * BOOK3S: one upper level directory entry points to a table of hugepages
> 
> In preparation of implementation of hugepage support on the 8xx, we
> need a mix of the two above solutions, because the 8xx needs both cases
> depending on the size of pages:
> * In 4k page size mode, each PGD entry covers a 4M bytes area. It means
> that 2 PGD entries will be necessary to cover an 8M hugepage while a
> single PGD entry will cover 8x 512k hugepages.
> * In 16 page size mode, each PGD entry covers a 64M bytes area. It means
> that 8x 8M hugepages will be covered by one PGD entry and 64x 512k
> hugepages will be covers by one PGD entry.
> 
> This patch:
> * removes #ifdefs in favor of if/else based on the range sizes
> * merges the two huge_pte_alloc() functions as they are pretty similar
> * merges the two hugetlbpage_init() functions as they are pretty similar
[snip]
> @@ -860,16 +803,34 @@ static int __init hugetlbpage_init(void)
>  		 * if we have pdshift and shift value same, we don't
>  		 * use pgt cache for hugepd.
>  		 */
> -		if (pdshift != shift) {
> +		if (pdshift > shift) {
>  			pgtable_cache_add(pdshift - shift, NULL);
>  			if (!PGT_CACHE(pdshift - shift))
>  				panic("hugetlbpage_init(): could not create
> "
>  				      "pgtable cache for %d bit
> pagesize\n", shift);
>  		}
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
> +		else if (!hugepte_cache) {

This else never triggers on book3e, because the way this function calculates
pdshift is wrong for book3e (it uses PyD_SHIFT instead of HUGEPD_PxD_SHIFT).
 We later get OOMs because huge_pte_alloc() calculates pdshift correctly,
tries to use hugepte_cache, and fails.

If the point of this patch is to remove the compile-time decision on whether
to do things the book3e way, why are there still ifdefs such as the ones
controlling the definition of HUGEPD_PxD_SHIFT?  How does what you're doing on
8xx (for certain page sizes) differ from book3e?

-Scott

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc: get hugetlbpage handling more generic Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> - 2016-12-06 02:20 +0100
  Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc: get hugetlbpage handling more generic Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2016-12-06 07:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc: get hugetlbpage handling more generic Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> - 2016-12-07 02:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc: get hugetlbpage handling more generic Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> - 2016-12-07 08:10 +0100

csiph-web