Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1536122

Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon 05-12-16 14:58:24, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 05-12-16 13:52:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Currently if a patch should aim a stable tree backport one should add
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # $version
> > > > 
> > > > to the s-o-b block. This has two major disadvantages a) it spams the
> > > > stable mailing list with patches which are just discussed and not merged
> > > > yet
> > > 
> > > That's not a problem in that I know I like to see them to give me a
> > > "heads up" that something is coming down the pipeline soon.
> > 
> > Are you really tracking all those discussion to catch resulting patches
> > in the Linus' tree? I simply fail to see a point having N versions of
> > the patch on the stable mailing list before it gets picked up from the
> > _Linus'_ anyayw.
> 
> I do scan them, sometimes I even find problems with them (like a zram
> "fix" that went by this weekend.)  So yes, it is always good to have
> more reviewers on patches, don't you think?

Yes I do agree that more review is better. But then the stable mailing
list is a complete failure in that resopect - at least for me. Why?
Simply because it doesn't contain discussion for the stable inclusion
but rather something that eventually might happen to become stable
material. This what I call noise and the reason why I've stopped
following the stable ML.

> > > I don't think anyone has ever complained of this before, do you?
> > 
> > This is the reason I have stopped following the stable mailing list.
> > The noise level is just too high.
> 
> What "noise"?  It's all patches that are being addressed to the stable
> kernels, how is that off-topic?  What do you expect to be posted to this
> list?

Patches which are final and target the stable tree. I do not have to see
N versions of patchesets which evolve in the time just to see that
something completely different has been merged to the Linus tree. 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-05 08:50 +0100
  Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-12-05 14:00 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-05 14:10 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-12-05 14:20 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-05 14:30 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2016-12-05 14:40 +0100
      Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-12-05 15:00 +0100
        Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-05 15:20 +0100
          Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-12-05 15:30 +0100
            Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-05 15:50 +0100
              Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-12-05 15:50 +0100
                Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is  requested Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-05 16:00 +0100

csiph-web