Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1536071
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add cond_resched into shrink_node_memcg |
| Date | 2016-12-05 14:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sL129-4GU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sJSNj-29y-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sL0St-4DH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[CC Paul - sorry I've tried to save you from more emails...] On Mon 05-12-16 23:44:27, Balbir Singh wrote: > > > > Hi, > > there were multiple reportes of the similar RCU stalls. Only Boris has > > confirmed that this patch helps in his workload. Others might see a > > slightly different issue and that should be investigated if it is the > > case. As pointed out by Paul [1] cond_resched might be not sufficient > > to silence RCU stalls because that would require a real scheduling. > > This is a separate problem, though, and Paul is working with Peter [2] > > to resolve it. > > > > Anyway, I believe that this patch should be a good start because it > > really seems that nr_taken=0 during the LRU isolation can be triggered > > in the real life. All reporters are agreeing to start seeing this issue > > when moving on to 4.8 kernel which might be just a coincidence or a > > different behavior of some subsystem. Well, MM has moved from zone to > > node reclaim but I couldn't have found any direct relation to that > > change. > > > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161130142955.GS3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161201124024.GB3924@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > > > mm/vmscan.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c > > index c05f00042430..c4abf08861d2 100644 > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c > > @@ -2362,6 +2362,8 @@ static void shrink_node_memcg(struct pglist_data *pgdat, struct mem_cgroup *memc > > } > > } > > > > + cond_resched(); > > + > > I see a cond_resched_rcu_qs() as a part of linux next inside the while > (nr[..]) loop. This is a left over from Paul's initial attempt to fix this issue. I expect him to drop his patch from his tree. He has considered it experimental anyway. > Do we need this as well? Paul is working with Peter to make cond_resched general and cover RCU stalls even when cond_resched doesn't schedule because there is no runnable task. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm, vmscan: add cond_resched into shrink_node_memcg Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-02 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add cond_resched into shrink_node_memcg Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> - 2016-12-05 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add cond_resched into shrink_node_memcg Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-12-05 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add cond_resched into shrink_node_memcg "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-12-05 17:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] mm, vmscan: add cond_resched into shrink_node_memcg Donald Buczek <buczek@molgen.mpg.de> - 2016-12-09 12:00 +0100
csiph-web