Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1536026

Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses.

From Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses.
Date 2016-12-05 13:00 +0100
Message-ID <sL06d-437-87@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sGDrr-3NA-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGY2X-lZ-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sH4UG-57A-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <sH9KF-8i4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJRoe-1bm-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi!

> the idea behind the TX mitigation is to mix the interrupt and
> timer and this approach gave us real benefit in terms
> of performances and CPU usage (especially on SH4-200/SH4-300 platforms
> based).
> In the ring, some descriptors can raise the irq (according to a
> threshold) and set the IC bit. In this path, the NAPI  poll will be
> scheduled.
> But there is a timer that can run (and we experimented that no high
> resolution is needed) to clear the tx resources.

I'm sorry, but it is just broken. It could have never worked. If it
appered it did, you did not test it right.

First, low-res timers have resolution down to one per second (see
David's email). It is not acceptable to delay transmits for 40msec,
and certainly not acceptable to delay them for 1000msec.

Second, the logic is wrong:

        if (likely(priv->tx_coal_frames > priv->tx_count_frames))
	                mod_timer(&priv->txtimer,
 				STMMAC_COAL_TIMER(priv->tx_coal_timer));
	                else {
 				priv->tx_count_frames = 0;
 				priv->hw->desc->set_tx_ic(desc);
 				priv->xstats.tx_set_ic_bit++;
			}
									

doing tx_clean() after set number of packets, or set time after the
first packet is transmitted would make sense. But that's not what the
code does. As long as packets are being transmitted, you move the
timer into the future.. so that finally you run out of the place, then
wait for timer (!) and only then you do the cleaning.

Third, times are wrong by order of magnitude. AFAICT cleaning should
be at around 5msec at 100mbit speeds, and at around .5msec at
gigabit. You have 40msec there. (Perhaps that is not too important if
the logic is fixed, as described above).

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> - 2016-12-02 09:30 +0100
  Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-12-02 09:50 +0100
    Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> - 2016-12-02 10:50 +0100
      Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-12-02 13:40 +0100
        Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> - 2016-12-02 15:00 +0100
          Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com> - 2016-12-02 15:30 +0100
            Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> - 2016-12-02 17:10 +0100
              Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-12-05 13:40 +0100
          Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-12-05 13:10 +0100
      Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-12-05 11:40 +0100
        Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. "Lino Sanfilippo" <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> - 2016-12-05 12:50 +0100
          Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-12-05 23:20 +0100
            Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> - 2016-12-05 23:40 +0100
              Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-12-05 23:50 +0100
                Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> - 2016-12-06 00:00 +0100
                Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> - 2016-12-06 00:20 +0100
    Aw: Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related  pauses. "Lino Sanfilippo" <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> - 2016-12-02 15:10 +0100
      [RFC] Re: Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related  pauses. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-12-07 13:40 +0100
        Re: [RFC] Re: Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing  related pauses. Lino Sanfilippo <lsanfil@marvell.com> - 2016-12-07 14:20 +0100
  Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@st.com> - 2016-12-02 09:50 +0100
  Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses. Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2016-12-05 13:00 +0100

csiph-web