Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1533971
| From | "Luc, Piotr" <Piotr.Luc@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH 11/11] tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support Knights Mill (KNM) |
| Date | 2016-12-01 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJxzb-38x-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <srQgV-5jv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <srQgW-5jv-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJtlU-hn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 01:47 -0500, Len Brown wrote: > Piotr, > Thanks for sending the patch, I've made this change to my turbostat > branch for 4.10. > > I did not apply your patch directly because for some reason it didn't > appear in patchwork for linux-pm, > only for lkml, which I do not review. The missing from linux-pm was my mistake due to lack of experience and perspicacity; I did not add the linux-pm list to cc because I could not find an entry for turbostat on MAINTAINERS file. Probably, it is mentioned implicitly but I did not come across it. > > Also, your patch depended on your style update patch to use the model > # macros. > Unfortunately what you did not know was that I'd already applied a > slightly different style update patch. > (and it was my fault that I did not push it upstream before my summer > sabbatical, sorry) NP, this was an easy change made automatically by my script. > > In general, though, a good strategy when mixing style and > functionality patches > is to do the functionality first. The reason is both that style > patches tend to conflict more, > and you don't want them to hold up the functionality. > Also, if your functionality patch does not depend on style, > it is easier to backport to distros who avoid style updates. Thanks for the tip. However, in this case, I got comments to use the macros instead raw numbers in my patch and remove unnecessary comments. It caused that the style patch came first. Thanks Piotr
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RESEND PATCH 11/11] tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support Knights Mill (KNM) Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> - 2016-12-01 07:50 +0100 Re: [RESEND PATCH 11/11] tools/power turbostat: enable turbostat to support Knights Mill (KNM) "Luc, Piotr" <Piotr.Luc@intel.com> - 2016-12-01 12:20 +0100
csiph-web