Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1533771
| From | "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCHv5 22/36] mm, hugetlb: switch hugetlbfs to multi-order radix-tree entries |
| Date | 2016-12-01 04:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJq4F-6F6-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sIOLL-7NC-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIOLM-7NC-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJ9Qd-4q9-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJcXL-6zu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 9:16 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:48:05PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > > On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 7:23 PM Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > @@ -607,10 +605,10 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, > > > } > > > > > > /* Set numa allocation policy based on index */ > > > - hugetlb_set_vma_policy(&pseudo_vma, inode, index); > > > + hugetlb_set_vma_policy(&pseudo_vma, inode, index >> huge_page_order(h)); > > > > > > /* addr is the offset within the file (zero based) */ > > > - addr = index * hpage_size; > > > + addr = index << PAGE_SHIFT & ~huge_page_mask(h); > > > > > > /* mutex taken here, fault path and hole punch */ > > > hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(h, mm, &pseudo_vma, mapping, > > > > Seems we can't use index in computing hash as long as it isn't in huge page size. > > Look at changes in hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(): we shift the index right by > huge_page_order(), before calculating the hash. I don't see a problem > here. > You are right. I missed that critical point. thanks Hillf
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCHv5 22/36] mm, hugetlb: switch hugetlbfs to multi-order radix-tree entries "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-29 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 22/36] mm, hugetlb: switch hugetlbfs to multi-order radix-tree entries "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-11-30 11:00 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 22/36] mm, hugetlb: switch hugetlbfs to multi-order radix-tree entries "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-30 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCHv5 22/36] mm, hugetlb: switch hugetlbfs to multi-order radix-tree entries "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-12-01 04:20 +0100
csiph-web