Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1533336
| From | Yuriy Kolerov <Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [RFC] ARC: mm: Restrict definition of pfn_valid() macro for CONFIG_FLATMEM |
| Date | 2016-11-30 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJe3v-7fx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sISw2-1KH-43@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJ9dv-4cm-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Michal Hocko [mailto:mhocko@kernel.org] > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 12:17 PM > To: Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov@synopsys.com> > Cc: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com; > Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [RFC] ARC: mm: Restrict definition of pfn_valid() macro for > CONFIG_FLATMEM > > On Tue 29-11-16 18:29:06, Yuriy Kolerov wrote: > > Despite the fact that subtraction of unsigned integers is a defined > > behaviour however such operations can lead to unexpected results. Thus > > it is better to check both left and right boundaries to avoid > > potential bugs as it done in the generic page.h. > > Why and which code would use an out of range pfn? Why other arches do > not need to care? Actually some arches do care about checking of both left and right boundaries (e.g. avr32, sparc, etc). The problem is that a value of pfn may be calculated incorrectly in some places of the kernel. E.g. not long ago I sent a patch which fixes truncation of the most significant byte in pfn/pte in some cases (in the kernel with PAE40, however it is not a FLATMEM case). So such situations can happens in the most unexpected places. > > > > Signed-off-by: Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov@synopsys.com> > > --- > > arch/arc/include/asm/page.h | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h > > index 296c342..81cfc6c7 100644 > > --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h > > +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/page.h > > @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ typedef pte_t * pgtable_t; > > #define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET > virt_to_pfn(CONFIG_LINUX_LINK_BASE) > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM > > -#define pfn_valid(pfn) (((pfn) - ARCH_PFN_OFFSET) < > max_mapnr) > > +#define pfn_valid(pfn) ((pfn) >= ARCH_PFN_OFFSET && > ((pfn) - ARCH_PFN_OFFSET) < max_mapnr) > > #endif > > > > /* > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > -- > Michal Hocko > SUSE Labs
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] ARC: mm: Restrict definition of pfn_valid() macro for CONFIG_FLATMEM Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-29 16:30 +0100
Re: [RFC] ARC: mm: Restrict definition of pfn_valid() macro for CONFIG_FLATMEM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-11-30 10:20 +0100
RE: [RFC] ARC: mm: Restrict definition of pfn_valid() macro for CONFIG_FLATMEM Yuriy Kolerov <Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-30 15:30 +0100
Re: [RFC] ARC: mm: Restrict definition of pfn_valid() macro for CONFIG_FLATMEM Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> - 2016-11-30 18:00 +0100
RE: [RFC] ARC: mm: Restrict definition of pfn_valid() macro for CONFIG_FLATMEM Yuriy Kolerov <Yuriy.Kolerov@synopsys.com> - 2016-12-02 15:20 +0100
csiph-web