Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1534768
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add a new flag for ITS device to control indirect route |
| Date | 2016-12-02 10:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJStY-22N-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sJuhX-PI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJvxn-1QI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJStY-22N-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ARM Ltd |
On 02/12/16 09:29, majun (Euler7) wrote: > > > 在 2016/12/1 17:07, Marc Zyngier 写道: >> On 01/12/16 07:45, Majun wrote: >>> From: MaJun <majun258@huawei.com> >>> >>> For current ITS driver, two level table (indirect route) is enabled when the memory used >>> for LPI route table over the limit(64KB * 2) size. But this function impact the >>> performance of LPI interrupt actually because need more time to look up the table. >> >> Are you implying that your ITS doesn't have a cache to lookup the most >> active devices, hence performing a full lookup on each interrupt? > > Our ITS chip has the cache with depth 64. But this seems not enough for some > scenario,espeically on virtulization platform. Then I don't see how switching to to flat tables is going to improve things. Can you share actual performance numbers? >> Anyway, doing this as a DT quirk doesn't feel right. Please use the ITS >> quirk infrastructure. > > If there is no other better solutions, I will do this. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH 0/3] Add a new flag for ITS device to control indirect route Majun <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-12-01 08:50 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add a new flag for ITS device to control indirect route Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-12-01 10:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add a new flag for ITS device to control indirect route "majun (Euler7)" <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-12-02 10:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add a new flag for ITS device to control indirect route Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-12-02 10:40 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add a new flag for ITS device to control indirect route "majun (Euler7)" <majun258@huawei.com> - 2016-12-05 04:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Add a new flag for ITS device to control indirect route Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-12-05 10:20 +0100
csiph-web