Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1533067
| From | Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] ALSA: SOC: DMA: increment buffer pointer atomically |
| Date | 2016-11-30 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sJ8AN-3Kh-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sJ8r8-3Hk-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJ8AN-3Kh-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11/30/2016 09:30 AM, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 09:22 AM, Jiada Wang wrote:
>> From: Andreas Pape <apape@de.adit-jv.com>
>>
>> Setting pointer and afterwards check for wrap around leads
>> to the possibility of returning the inconsistent pointer position.
>> This patch increments buffer pointer atomically to avoid this issue.
>
> Makes sense.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Pape <apape@de.adit-jv.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
>> ---
>> sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
>> index 8eb58c7..6f6da11 100644
>> --- a/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
>> +++ b/sound/core/pcm_dmaengine.c
>> @@ -139,12 +139,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_dmaengine_pcm_set_config_from_dai_data);
>>
>> static void dmaengine_pcm_dma_complete(void *arg)
>> {
>> + unsigned int new_pos;
>> struct snd_pcm_substream *substream = arg;
>> struct dmaengine_pcm_runtime_data *prtd = substream_to_prtd(substream);
>>
>> - prtd->pos += snd_pcm_lib_period_bytes(substream);
>> - if (prtd->pos >= snd_pcm_lib_buffer_bytes(substream))
>> - prtd->pos = 0;
>> + new_pos = prtd->pos + snd_pcm_lib_period_bytes(substream);
>> + if (new_pos >= snd_pcm_lib_buffer_bytes(substream))
>> + new_pos = 0;
>> + prtd->pos = new_pos;
>
> But to really make it atomic I think this needs READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE.
And the access to prtd->pos in snd_dmaengine_pcm_pointer_no_residue() should
also use READ_ONCE(). It is very unlikely that the code gets mis-compiled to
generate more than one access, but having READ_ONCE() acts as a annotation
that makes it explicit that this is data that can be updated concurrently
without further synchronization.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/1] ALSA: SOC: DMA: increment buffer pointer atomically Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com> - 2016-11-30 09:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] ALSA: SOC: DMA: increment buffer pointer atomically Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2016-11-30 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] ALSA: SOC: DMA: increment buffer pointer atomically Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2016-11-30 09:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/1] ALSA: SOC: DMA: increment buffer pointer atomically Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2016-11-30 10:20 +0100
csiph-web