Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1533049

Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x

From Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x
Date 2016-11-30 09:10 +0100
Message-ID <sJ87L-3xH-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <sJ7Y6-3eC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJ3rr-mM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <sJ7Y6-3eC-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 11/30/2016 08:51 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Tin,
>
> How this patch is different from the one already merged?
>
> Best regards,
> Jacek Anaszewski
>
> On 11/30/2016 04:08 AM, Tin Huynh wrote:
>> This patch enables ACPI support for leds-pca955x driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> Change from V2:
>>  -Correct coding conventions.
>>
>> Change from V1:
>>  -Remove CONFIG_ACPI.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c
>> index 840401a..b168ebe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pca955x.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>>   *  bits the chip supports.
>>   */
>>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>>  #include <linux/module.h>
>>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>>  #include <linux/string.h>
>> @@ -100,6 +101,15 @@ struct pca955x_chipdef {
>>  };
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pca955x_id);
>>
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id pca955x_acpi_ids[] = {
>> +    { .id = "PCA9550", .driver_data = pca9550 },
>> +    { .id = "PCA9551", .driver_data = pca9551 },
>> +    { .id = "PCA9552", .driver_data = pca9552 },
>> +    { .id = "PCA9553", .driver_data = pca9553 },
>> +    { }

OK, I see that you brought back explicit properties in the
structure initializer. Is there some vital reason for that?
You're mentioning "correcting coding conventions" in the
patch changelog. checkpatch.pl --strict doesn't complain about
that, so what coding conventions you have on mind?

>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, pca955x_acpi_ids);
>> +
>>  struct pca955x {
>>      struct mutex lock;
>>      struct pca955x_led *leds;
>> @@ -250,7 +260,16 @@ static int pca955x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>      struct led_platform_data *pdata;
>>      int i, err;
>>
>> -    chip = &pca955x_chipdefs[id->driver_data];
>> +    if (id) {
>> +        chip = &pca955x_chipdefs[id->driver_data];
>> +    } else {
>> +        const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
>> +
>> +        acpi_id = acpi_match_device(pca955x_acpi_ids, &client->dev);
>> +        if (!acpi_id)
>> +            return -ENODEV;
>> +        chip = &pca955x_chipdefs[acpi_id->driver_data];
>> +    }
>>      adapter = to_i2c_adapter(client->dev.parent);
>>      pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
>>
>> @@ -358,6 +377,7 @@ static int pca955x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>>  static struct i2c_driver pca955x_driver = {
>>      .driver = {
>>          .name    = "leds-pca955x",
>> +        .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(pca955x_acpi_ids),
>>      },
>>      .probe    = pca955x_probe,
>>      .remove    = pca955x_remove,
>>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>


-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com> - 2016-11-30 04:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2016-11-30 09:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com> - 2016-11-30 09:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2016-11-30 09:20 +0100
        RE: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Phong Vo <pvo@apm.com> - 2016-11-30 09:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2016-11-30 10:10 +0100
            RE: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Phong Vo <pvo@apm.com> - 2016-11-30 10:20 +0100
              Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2016-11-30 11:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2016-11-30 11:10 +0100
              Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2016-11-30 11:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V3] leds: pca955x: Add ACPI support for pca955x Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com> - 2016-11-30 09:10 +0100

csiph-web