Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1532124
| From | Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] powernv:idle: Add IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ_NORET macro |
| Date | 2016-11-29 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sIO94-7lk-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sBSr7-2As-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sBSr7-2As-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 10/11/16 18:54, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Currently all the low-power idle states are expected to wake up > at reset vector 0x100. Which is why the macro IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ > that puts the CPU to an idle state and never returns. > > On ISA_300, when the ESL and EC bits in the PSSCR are zero, the > CPU is expected to wake up at the next instruction of the idle > instruction. > > This patch adds a new macro named IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ_NORET for the I think something like IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ_LOSE_CTX would be better? > no-return variant and reuses the name IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ > for a variant that allows resuming operation at the instruction next > to the idle-instruction. > <snip> > + > +#define IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ_NORET(IDLE_INST) \ > + IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ(IDLE_INST) \ So we start off with both as the same? > b . > #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_P7_NAP */ <snip> Balbir
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] powernv:idle: Add IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ_NORET macro Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 11:50 +0100 Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] powernv:idle: Add IDLE_STATE_ENTER_SEQ_NORET macro Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-12-05 10:30 +0100
csiph-web