Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1531927

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Show all headers | View raw

On 11/29/2016 01:31 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>    net/sched/cls_flower.c
>
> between commit:
>
>    d936377414fa ("net, sched: respect rcu grace period on cls destruction")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
>    13fa876ebd03 ("net/sched: cls_flower: merge filter delete/destroy common code")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Looks good to me, thanks!

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-11-29 01:40 +0100
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2016-11-29 07:40 +0100

csiph-web