Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1531802
| From | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: net: GPF in eth_header |
| Date | 2016-11-29 00:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sIDnj-aD-31@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <sIBlw-7lp-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIBvb-7oU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIBOy-7vt-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <sICrg-82A-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <sICAW-85L-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 23:19 +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > It currently returns -EINVAL in cases where skb wasn't changed/altered > (e.g. because it doesn't have a fragment header), so we should ACCEPT in > that case. > Maybe nf_ct_frag6_queue() should return direct NF_ codes then ...
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
net: GPF in eth_header Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-11-26 18:40 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> - 2016-11-26 19:30 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2016-11-26 20:10 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <erdlkml@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 21:10 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <erdlkml@gmail.com> - 2016-11-26 21:40 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2016-11-29 11:30 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 16:00 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2016-11-29 16:40 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 17:20 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 20:00 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com> - 2016-11-28 20:10 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> - 2016-11-28 20:40 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 20:50 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 22:10 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 22:20 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> - 2016-11-28 22:40 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-28 23:20 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> - 2016-11-28 23:30 +0100
Re: net: GPF in eth_header Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-11-29 00:20 +0100
csiph-web