Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1531740
| From | Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices |
| Date | 2016-11-28 23:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sICAW-85L-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <sIxrA-4y6-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIyQG-5J3-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIBOx-7vt-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sIBOx-7vt-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <sICAW-85L-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:55:23PM -0500, Serguei Sagalovitch wrote: > >We haven't touch this in a long time and perhaps it changed, but there > >definitely was a call back in the PeerDirect API to allow the GPU to > >invalidate the mapping. That's what we don't want. > I assume that you are talking about "invalidate_peer_memory()' callback? > I was told that it is the "last resort" because HCA (and driver) is not > able to handle it in the safe manner so it is basically "abort" everything. If it is a last resort to save system stability then kill the impacted process, that will release the MRs. Jason
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-11-25 20:40 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> - 2016-11-25 21:50 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-11-25 22:20 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-11-28 18:00 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2016-11-28 19:30 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2016-11-28 22:40 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-11-28 23:30 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-11-28 20:10 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-11-30 17:30 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2016-11-30 19:10 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices "Stephen Bates" <sbates@raithlin.com> - 2016-12-04 14:10 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices "Stephen Bates" <sbates@raithlin.com> - 2016-12-04 14:50 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-12-05 18:20 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-12-05 18:50 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-12-05 19:10 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2016-12-05 19:40 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-12-05 19:50 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-12-05 20:20 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2016-12-05 20:30 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-12-05 20:50 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2016-12-05 21:00 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-12-05 21:10 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices "Stephen Bates" <sbates@raithlin.com> - 2016-12-06 09:30 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-12-06 17:40 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2016-12-06 18:00 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-12-06 18:30 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> - 2016-12-06 22:50 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2016-12-06 23:10 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-12-06 18:20 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2016-12-05 19:10 +0100
RE: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com> - 2016-11-30 18:50 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com> - 2016-11-28 21:00 +0100
Re: Enabling peer to peer device transactions for PCIe devices Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com> - 2016-11-28 19:40 +0100
csiph-web