Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1527879
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: Verify access_ok() context |
| Date | 2016-11-22 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <sGpeN-365-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sGg1Q-5rf-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGn3j-1LJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <sGp58-32O-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> CONFIG_DEBUG_VM seems somehow inappropriate.
The usual might_fault() logic? That uses
defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) || defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP)
(and "might_sleep()" uses just CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, maybe that's fine).
Linus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH] x86: Verify access_ok() context Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-22 11:00 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: Verify access_ok() context Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-11-22 18:30 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: Verify access_ok() context Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-11-22 20:40 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: Verify access_ok() context Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-11-22 20:50 +0100
csiph-web