Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1527277

Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: qcom-qmp: new qmp phy driver for qcom-chipsets

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Kishon,


On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Vivek Gautam
<vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>

>>> +unsigned int msm8996_pciephy_tx_offsets[] = { 0x1000, 0x2000, 0x3000 };
>>> +unsigned int msm8996_pciephy_rx_offsets[] = { 0x1200, 0x2200, 0x3200 };
>>> +unsigned int msm8996_pciephy_pcs_offsets[] = { 0x1400, 0x2400, 0x3400 };

>> you can have a separate reg map for each lane and all these can come from dt.
>
> The idea is to avoid the any child nodes for lanes. So, we have the complete
> ioremaped region and these offsets to tx, rx and pcs blocks.

I don't see benefits in using regmap for different lanes.
Do you see benefits in replacing a bunch of readl()/writel() with
regmap_read()/regmap_update_bits()/regmap_write() ?

I can as well use separate 'reg' values for each lanes, and have the offsets
come from dt. Something like below :

 - reg: array of offset and length of the PHY register sets.
       at index 0: offset and length of register set for PHY common
                   serdes block.
       from index 1 - N: offset and length of register set for each lane,
                         for N number of phy lanes (ports).
 - lane-offsets: array of offsets to tx, rx and pcs blocks for phy lanes.

Example:
       pcie_phy: pciephy@34000 {
               compatible = "qcom,msm8996-qmp-pcie-phy";
               reg = <0x034000 0x48f>,
                       <0x035000 5bf>,
                       <0x036000 5bf>,
                       <0x037000 5bf>;
                                       /* tx, rx, pcs */
               lane-offsets = <0x0 0x200 0x400>;


Does this look OK ? Or should i use regmap only ?


Thanks
Vivek
-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: qcom-qmp: new qmp phy driver for qcom-chipsets Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> - 2016-11-22 08:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: qcom-qmp: new qmp phy driver for qcom-chipsets Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> - 2016-11-22 10:10 +0100

csiph-web